Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:34:40.873023] On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:25.723824] Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan > wrote: > >> >> >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] > Ahmet > > > On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking this up Nick! > > Here's my

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] Ahmet On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: Thanks for taking this up Nick! Here's my +1: SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: Please vote for the RC2

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Thanks for taking this up Nick! Here's my +1: SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 Docs, changes and javadocs look good, except that there is a 5.5.1 section in Solr’s CHANGES.txt, but there shouldn’t be (shouldn’t block release, IMO). Smoke tester: SUCCESS! [0:24:05.242799] -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:33:01.168718] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

FYI there is a reproducing failure in lucene/spatial on branch_6_0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7172 -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Aha, I bet this is related to SOLR-8724 (upgrade Solr to Zookeeper 3.4.8) - I was using locally compiled jars of 3.4.6 with extra debug printing, not sure how/why it made it to my Ivy cache, but I’m clearing it and restarting the smoke tester. Sorry for the noise. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

I got a dependency checksum failure when I ran the smoke tester, which is weird, since others have already succeeded, and I would think that the test is deterministic… I’m looking into it: —— check-licenses: [echo] License check under:

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Hi Jack > Adding this less-controversial point: > > 5. It should have been stated explicitly that Java 1.9 is not supported at > this time. I am not sure why you want to have this in the release notes. This is completely irrelevant: - Java 9 is not yet released, so nobody would use it in

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Hi, I'm not sure what I'm doing, but SUCCESS! [1:55:30.799304] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for doing this Nick! SUCCESS! [0:40:21.687836] On 1 April 2016 at 22:44, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3 Smoke tester: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py