Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Hi, > On 29 Feb 2024, at 11:38, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > this vote has passed. I was about to send a note about this, but you beat me to it! ;-) The substantive point is that the vote passed - Awesome! > > I wanted to wait for Chris to merge the PR, but due to heavy working on

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Hi, this vote has passed. I wanted to wait for Chris to merge the PR, but due to heavy working on main removing ByteBufferIndexInput and updating Java versions, I accidentally pushed the wrong branch to main, so it is already merged. The PRwas closed manually. Lucene "main" (10.0) is now

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On 2024/02/23 11:24:10 Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding > down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version of Java

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1, exciting! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:24 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 - Houston On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:00 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > Jan > > 23. feb. 2024 kl. 20:01 skrev Patrick Zhai : > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> >> I'm fine with this requirement. >> >> +1. >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty >>

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 Jan > 23. feb. 2024 kl. 20:01 skrev Patrick Zhai : > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss > wrote: >> >> I'm fine with this requirement. >> >> +1. >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since the

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 7:08 PM Stefan Vodita wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 11:24, Chris Hegarty > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding >> down, let's hold a vote on this important change. >> >> Once bumped, the next

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 11:24, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version of

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

SGTM! +1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:04 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> >> I'm fine with this requirement. >> >> +1. >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since the discussion on bumping the

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > I'm fine with this requirement. > > +1. > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is >> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

I'm fine with this requirement. +1. On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:24 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:34 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: >> > > Hi, >>

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Here is my +1 > > Uwe > > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > > Hi, > > > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > > > Once

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Here is my +1 Uwe Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: Hi, Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will require a version of

[Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Hi, Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will require a version of Java greater than or equal to Java 21. The vote will be open for