Re: [apache/lucene] Run failed: Run nightly: buildAndPushRelease and smokeTestRelease.py - main (df154cd)

2024-04-05 Thread Dawid Weiss
+1. I think the idea of those smoketester checks was to only have it for actually released versions. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > Hmm, yeah. Honestly, I am not sure what to do about this either. I am > going to remove the 9.10.1 versioning from all branches but 9.10

Re: [apache/lucene] Run failed: Run nightly: buildAndPushRelease and smokeTestRelease.py - main (df154cd)

2024-04-05 Thread Benjamin Trent
Hmm, yeah. Honestly, I am not sure what to do about this either. I am going to remove the 9.10.1 versioning from all branches but 9.10 (it's there to capture the next bugfix). I thought I was doing something helpful, but I guess I was a little too eager. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:13 AM Dawid

Re: [apache/lucene] Run failed: Run nightly: buildAndPushRelease and smokeTestRelease.py - main (df154cd)

2024-04-05 Thread Dawid Weiss
Hi Ben, This fails in the smoke tester - failed last night too, so it reproduces. https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/workflows/run-nightly-smoketester.yml I looked it up to getAllLuceneReleases in the smoke tester script, which in turn lists all releases available at:

Re: [apache/lucene] Run failed: Run nightly: buildAndPushRelease and smokeTestRelease.py - main (df154cd)

2024-04-04 Thread Benjamin Trent
This seems related to us forgetting to make the back-compat indices & versions when 9.10.1 was released and me adding them later. I have since added the 9.10.1 to Version.java and version.txt in main and 9x. Now, both main and 9x have the back-compat indices (these changes were not at the same

Re: [apache/lucene] Run failed: Run nightly: buildAndPushRelease and smokeTestRelease.py - main (df154cd)

2024-04-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/8548297347/job/23421799032 This smoketester run failed with: > RuntimeError: tested version=9.10.1 but it was not released? I guess it's not a hiccup but something recent? On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:24 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > [image: GitHub]