[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10869) Make StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory as Runtime URP; take params(s) with request

2017-06-12 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16047359#comment-16047359 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10869: - Please check that we don't introduce new attack vectors. i.e.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10869) Make StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory as Runtime URP; take params(s) with request

2017-06-11 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16045921#comment-16045921 ] Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-10869: - Thanks [~erikhatcher] {quote} I think the parameter prefix is

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10869) Make StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory as Runtime URP; take params(s) with request

2017-06-11 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16045905#comment-16045905 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-10869: - bq. So the initEngines(...) is called at inform(...) to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10869) Make StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory as Runtime URP; take params(s) with request

2017-06-11 Thread Amrit Sarkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16045879#comment-16045879 ] Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-10869: - I have a question on the implementation of this: There are two