[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16895770#comment-16895770
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-11266:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16891174#comment-16891174
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
Planning to commit in a day or two. [~gus_heck], could you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889566#comment-16889566
]
Lucene/Solr QA commented on SOLR-11266:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889497#comment-16889497
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
[^SOLR-11266.patch]
Doesn't look like test failure is due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889471#comment-16889471
]
Lucene/Solr QA commented on SOLR-11266:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889170#comment-16889170
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-11266:
-
I do agree that it's not a bug by the way :)
> V2 API returning wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889155#comment-16889155
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11266:
-
> One can't say that we are serving valid JSON
Perhaps not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889152#comment-16889152
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-11266:
-
{quote}More than someone trying to write a context-free Solr client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889096#comment-16889096
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11266:
-
> I'm not of the opinion that users looking at a response in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889041#comment-16889041
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
[^SOLR-11266.patch]
commented content-type in default config
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16888964#comment-16888964
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-11266:
-
{quote}Adding different config for browser would be maintenance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16888960#comment-16888960
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
{code:xml}
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16887966#comment-16887966
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-11266:
-
For reference, this is the override from the configs:
{code:xml}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16886708#comment-16886708
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
[~gus_heck]
Thanks for your insights. +1 to return Standard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16886363#comment-16886363
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-11266:
-
This behavior has been a peeve of mine... I've always found it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16886276#comment-16886276
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
Current behavior of V2 API is consistent with v1 API but when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16789248#comment-16789248
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-11266:
-
[~ichattopadhyaya]
This is because of the difference in the
17 matches
Mail list logo
