[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240991#comment-13240991
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-435:
---
(This patch didn't break the build.)
Since this is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239605#comment-13239605
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-435:
---
bq. Why not simply apply the SOLR-2001 patch for consistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239670#comment-13239670
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-435:
---
I'm onboard with SOLR-2001. My 1st concern was the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238992#comment-13238992
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-435:
-
{quote}
QParsers (and QParserPlugins) can't be made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239023#comment-13239023
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-435:
---
bq. Again I agree. But I'm just not sure if that validation /
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239047#comment-13239047
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-435:
-
{quote}
Not sure i see the problem, ... part of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239078#comment-13239078
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-435:
-
bq. Sorry ... i was looking at my patched version –
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239087#comment-13239087
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-435:
---
bq. I agree but I also think we should commit the improved
