NumericUtils.floatToSortableInt does not sort certain NaN ranges correctly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: LUCENE-3582
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3582
             Project: Lucene - Java
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
            Priority: Trivial
             Fix For: 4.0


The current implementation of floatToSortableInt does not account for different 
NaN ranges which may result in NaNs sorted before -Infinity and after 
+Infinity. The default Java ordering is: all NaNs after Infinity.

A possible fix is to make all NaNs canonic "quiet NaN" as in:
{code}
// Canonicalize NaN ranges. I assume this check will be faster here than 
// (v == v) == false on the FPU? We don't distinguish between different
// flavors of NaNs here (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaN). I guess
// in Java this doesn't matter much anyway.
if ((v & 0x7fffffff) > 0x7f800000) {
  // Apply the logic below to a canonical "quiet NaN"
  return 0x7fc00000 ^ 0x80000000;
}
{code}

I don't commit because I don't know how much of the existing stuff relies on 
this (nobody should be keeping different NaNs  in their indexes, but who 
knows...).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to