[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2898) CMS merge throttling is not aggressive enough

2011-01-30 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988614#action_12988614 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2898: bq. If however MP returns N + 1 m

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2898) CMS merge throttling is not aggressive enough

2011-01-30 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988595#action_12988595 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2898: So if the user allows for N max-merges in CMS, an

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2898) CMS merge throttling is not aggressive enough

2011-01-30 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988574#action_12988574 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2898: bq. So now the code will wait unt

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2898) CMS merge throttling is not aggressive enough

2011-01-29 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988540#action_12988540 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2898: Mike, now that you wait before you poll IW.getNex