[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874575#action_12874575
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1914:
Looks like this was sort of fixed for Python & Ruby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868439#action_12868439
]
Sascha Jovanoski commented on SOLR-1914:
hi Yonik,
yes you are right! if i replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868270#action_12868270
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1914:
One issue I see is an NaN in the JSON response... u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868128#action_12868128
]
Sascha Jovanoski commented on SOLR-1914:
thx so far,
i did some tests. i will atta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867522#action_12867522
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1914:
It's not clear if this is a Solr bug, or just some