[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12896254#action_12896254
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-945:
---
OK, I just backported this to the 3x branch.
> JSON u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12882287#action_12882287
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-945:
---
Yeah, this should be able to go back to the 3x branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12882232#action_12882232
]
Paul Dlug commented on SOLR-945:
Is there any chance this could be backported to branch_3x? (
: Any objections to committing this to trunk soon?
I'd forgotten all about it.
I saw go for it ... i think ultimately it would be nice to allow for some
braoder types of JSON structures that are then "flattened" in to field=val
pairs either through convention or configuration (similar to elast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867671#action_12867671
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-945:
---
Any objections to committing this to trunk soon?
> JS
