+1 to get 4.0 out soon.
Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truejqlQuery=project+%3D+SOLR+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%224.0%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
Three of which are blockers, but
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1 to get 4.0 out soon.
Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0:
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1 to get 4.0 out soon.
Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0:
Hi Rob.
I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters
get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like
LUCENE-4208.
~ David
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Hi Rob.
I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters
get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like
LUCENE-4208.
~ David
As far as new features
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Hi Rob.
I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial
adapters
get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like
14, 2012 11:20 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.0 planning
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Hi Rob.
I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial
adapters
get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
I see your point, second option sounds much better.
We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like:
- fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks)
- code freeze for 1/2 weeks
- release
- celebrate :-)
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
I see your point, second option sounds much better.
We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like:
- fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks)
- code freeze
As a followup to the thread [DISCUSS] define what/when a 4.0-beta
should be (http://find.searchhub.org/document/76862e33bce71ca7), we
have had 4.0-BETA out nearly a month now.
I think its time to look at the final release: this has taken forever :)
As a start I moved all JIRA issues not touched
I've got a variety of very important fixes I have accumulated over the
past couple weeks in my quest to make SolrCloud fault tolerance
rock-solid before the 4 release. Things are starting to look pretty
great, and I hope to get these fixes in over the next couple days.
- Mark
On Mon, Sep 10,
sounds great.
maybe we can do something to mark these so they are clear? (add some
tag or priority=Critical or something?)
I was just thinking if we can somehow make jira less of a wasteland
for fixVersion=4.0, it would help us actually get this thing out and
feel good about it.
On Mon, Sep 10,
12 matches
Mail list logo