Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 to get 4.0 out soon. Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truejqlQuery=project+%3D+SOLR+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%224.0%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Three of which are blockers, but

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1 to get 4.0 out soon. Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0:

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1 to get 4.0 out soon. Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0:

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
Hi Rob. I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like LUCENE-4208. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context:

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Hi Rob. I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like LUCENE-4208. ~ David As far as new features

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Hi Rob. I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Jack Krupansky
14, 2012 11:20 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.0 planning On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Hi Rob. I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial adapters get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: I see your point, second option sounds much better. We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like: - fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks) - code freeze for 1/2 weeks - release - celebrate :-)

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-14 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/9/14 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: I see your point, second option sounds much better. We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like: - fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks) - code freeze

4.0 planning

2012-09-10 Thread Robert Muir
As a followup to the thread [DISCUSS] define what/when a 4.0-beta should be (http://find.searchhub.org/document/76862e33bce71ca7), we have had 4.0-BETA out nearly a month now. I think its time to look at the final release: this has taken forever :) As a start I moved all JIRA issues not touched

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-10 Thread Mark Miller
I've got a variety of very important fixes I have accumulated over the past couple weeks in my quest to make SolrCloud fault tolerance rock-solid before the 4 release. Things are starting to look pretty great, and I hope to get these fixes in over the next couple days. - Mark On Mon, Sep 10,

Re: 4.0 planning

2012-09-10 Thread Robert Muir
sounds great. maybe we can do something to mark these so they are clear? (add some tag or priority=Critical or something?) I was just thinking if we can somehow make jira less of a wasteland for fixVersion=4.0, it would help us actually get this thing out and feel good about it. On Mon, Sep 10,