Re: Copyrights

2016-03-01 Thread Mark Miller
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:24 PM david.w.smi...@gmail.com < david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm considering doing some enhancements to Lucene/Solr on behalf of > another organization/entity who wants me to include copyright statements to > them. Same ASLv2 license. This is no big deal; right?

Re: Copyrights

2016-03-01 Thread david.w.smi...@gmail.com
I'll send a note to that Apache list; thanks for the reference. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM Mike Drob wrote: > I would check with legal-discuss@a.o to be sure, but here is my > understanding of relevant ASF policies: > > All work done and contributed by an individual is bound by the terms of

Re: Copyrights

2016-03-01 Thread Mike Drob
I would check with legal-discuss@a.o to be sure, but here is my understanding of relevant ASF policies: All work done and contributed by an individual is bound by the terms of your ICLA. You retain the copyright ownership under ASLv2, but have granted the ASF (an irrevocable?) permission and licen

Copyrights

2016-03-01 Thread david.w.smi...@gmail.com
I'm considering doing some enhancements to Lucene/Solr on behalf of another organization/entity who wants me to include copyright statements to them. Same ASLv2 license. This is no big deal; right? I see we've already got some source files with non-ASF copyright licenses (e.g. Automata.java and o