Ok then extending FieldCache is really a problem :).
Thanks,
Shai
On Friday, June 4, 2010, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Ah this is the explanation, all fields in interfaces are static final:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1513520/java-why-all-fields-in-an-interfa
> ce-are-implicitly-s
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 7:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Extending FieldCache
>
> Interface's (FieldCache is an interface) fields are always static (and
final? - I
> think
il: [email protected]
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 6:55 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Extending FieldCache
>
> Actually DEFAULT is not defined final, but I haven&#x
hold for
more than a year …
I can impl my cache layer and duplicate TopFieldCollector logic.
Thanks anyway,
Shai
On Friday, June 4, 2010, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> I've looked into extending FieldCache, so that I can read the val
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I've looked into extending FieldCache, so that I can read the values to
> cache in a custom manner (not necessarily from the field's values). Just
> want to confirm my understanding - it looks like if I want to do it, I
Hi
I've looked into extending FieldCache, so that I can read the values to
cache in a custom manner (not necessarily from the field's values). Just
want to confirm my understanding - it looks like if I want to do it, I'll
need to create my own FieldCache impl, and then set FieldCac
