Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

ill benefit many >> users. >> >> Christine >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 07/05/17 >> 16:00:48 >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Feature freeze @ 7.

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

pache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10985> included in 7.0 since it's > a small low-risk change but it being in cache classes will benefit many users. > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 07/05/17 > 16:00:48 > To: dev@lucene.a

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

a/browse/SOLR-10985 included > in 7.0 since it's a small low-risk change but it being in cache classes > will benefit many users. > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 07/05/17 16:00:48 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch &g

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10985 included in 7.0 since it's a small low-risk change but it being in cache classes will benefit many users. Christine From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 07/05/17 16:00:48 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Feature fr

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Sure Mikhail, and Mike. -Anshum > On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > Is it worth to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986 > fixes regression in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6357 >

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

+1 Simon! On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:45 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I was hoping to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9526 in > 7.0 to go along with the improved usability of data driven schema. Still > one NOCOMMIT to solve. WDYT? > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominve

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

I was hoping to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9526 in 7.0 to go along with the improved usability of data driven schema. Still one NOCOMMIT to solve. WDYT? -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.co

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

I'd like to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7896 to the branch_7_0 (upgrade to RandomziedRunner) unless anybody objects?! simon On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Is it worth to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986 fixes > regression in

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Is it worth to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986 fixes regression in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6357 into 7.0? On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hi Anshum, I'd like to do https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Hi Anshum, I'd like to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 for 7.0; it's a simple rename, which I think we should do on major release. I'll get a patch up shortly. Thanks, Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > S

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Sure Ab, this is an important bug fix. -Anshum On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM Andrzej Białecki < andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: > SOLR-10878 and SOLR-10879 didn’t make it before the branches were cut, but > I think they should be included in 7x and 7_0 - I’m going to cherry-pick > the c

Re: Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

SOLR-10878 and SOLR-10879 didn’t make it before the branches were cut, but I think they should be included in 7x and 7_0 - I’m going to cherry-pick the commits from master. > On 3 Jul 2017, at 22:29, Anshum Gupta wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wanted to call it out and remove any confusions around

Feature freeze @ 7.0 branch

Hi, I just wanted to call it out and remove any confusions around the fact that we shouldn’t we committing ‘new features’ to branch_7_0. As far as whatever was already agreed upon in previous communications, let’s get that stuff in if it’s ready or almost there. For everything else, kindly chec