Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-14 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Dorian Hoxha wrote: > Was thinking also how bing doesn't use posting lists > and > This is an interesting case with unlimited termdictionary. I think you can do that in Lucene if you rewrite terms to

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-10 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
RedisSearch seems to be fully in-memory and have no analysis or query chain. Or any real multilingual support. It is pears and apples comparison and their "big" feature is what Lucene started from (term list). I don't even see phrase search support, as they don't seem to implement posting list,

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-10 Thread Dorian Hoxha
@Alex, I don't know if you've seen it, but there's also redissearch module which they claim to be faster (ofc less features): https://redislabs.com/blog/adding-search-engine-redis-adventures-module-land/ http://www.slideshare.net/RedisLabs/redis-for-search

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-10 Thread Dorian Hoxha
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > One you filter out the JIRA messages, the forum is very strong and > alive. It is just very focused on its purpose - building Solr and > Lucene and ElasticSearch. > Will do just that. Thanks. > > As to

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-08 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
One you filter out the JIRA messages, the forum is very strong and alive. It is just very focused on its purpose - building Solr and Lucene and ElasticSearch. As to "perfection" - nothing is perfect, you can just look at the list of the open JIRAs to confirm that for Lucene and/or Solr. But there

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-02-08 Thread Dorian Hoxha
So, am I asking too much (maybe), is this forum dead (then where to ask ? there is extreme noise here), is lucene perfect(of course not) ? On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Dorian Hoxha wrote: > Was thinking also how bing doesn't use posting lists >

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-01-25 Thread Dorian Hoxha
Was thinking also how bing doesn't use posting lists and also compiling queries ! About the queries, I would've think it wouldn't be as high overhead as queries in in rdbms since those apply on each row while on search

Re: How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-01-23 Thread Jeff Wartes
I’ve had some curiosity about this question too. For a while, I watched for a seastar-like library for the JVM, but https://github.com/bestwpw/windmill was the only one I came across, and it doesn’t seem to be going anywhere. Since one of the points of the JVM is to abstract away the

How would you architect solr/lucene if you were starting from scratch for them to be 10X+ faster/efficient ?

2017-01-20 Thread Dorian Hoxha
Hi friends, I was thinking how scylladb architecture works compared to cassandra which gives them 10x+ performance and lower latency. If you were starting lucene and solr from scratch what would you do to achieve something similar ? Different