uld close the index file as soon as it has
> been read
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-5050
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5050
> Project: Lucene -
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1491909
LUCENE-5050: Close the stored fields and term vectors index files eagerly
(merged from r1491889).
> CompressingStoredFieldsReader should close the index file as soon as it has
+1
> CompressingStoredFieldsReader should close the index file as soon as it has
> been read
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-5050
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5050
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-5050:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-5050.patch
Here is a patch which closes the index file in the constructor
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-5050:
Summary: CompressingStoredFieldsReader should close the index file
as soon as it has been read
Key: LUCENE-5050
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5050
Hi,
I just modified the Lucene 4.1 stored fields format again[1]. You should
reindex.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4558
--
Adrien
Thank you for that clarification!
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:10 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Heads-up] Index file format change on trunk
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Hmmm... does this mean that
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Hmmm... does this mean that 4.1 would REQUIRE reindexing?
>
No it doesn't. This is a notice for people who would already use the
(unreleased) Lucene41Codec for some test indexes to tell them that they
should reindex if they want
a reindex? I don’t
recall seeing any discussion here about it.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:00 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Heads-up] Index file format change on trunk
Hi,
I just committed LUCENE-4509 [1] which changes the default
Hi,
I just committed LUCENE-4509 [1] which changes the default
StoredFieldsFormat on trunk (backport to come on branch 4.x in a few
minutes). You should reindex.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509
--
Adrien
9 AM org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller copyAFile
SEVERE: Unable to move index file from:
/opt/solr/multicore/1011/data/index.20120731065949/_9x.tis to:
/mnt/multicore/1011/data/index.20120731050740/_9x.tisTrying to do a copy
Jul 31, 2012 6:59:49 AM org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller copyAFile
SEVERE: Unabl
the patch is not needed
However I am still getting the error
SEVERE: Unable to copy index file from:
/opt/solr/multicore/1011/data/index.20120731065949/_9x.tis to:
/mnt/multicore/1011/data/index.20120731050740/_9x.tis
Note: /opt/solr/multicore is a symlink to /mnt/multi
. On close analysis of
SnapPuller.java I notice that the fix mentioned in the attachment is not done
> SEVERE: Unable to move index file from: tempfile to: indexfile
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-1822
>
Hey folks,
I just committed LUCENE-4051 [1] (Revision 1341768) which changes the
file format of DocValues, Norms (DocValues), StoredFields &
TermVectors incompatible to previous revisions. If you are using trunk
indices you must re-index before updating to the latest trunk
sources.
If you are usi
Folks,
I just committed LUCENE-3628 [1] which cuts over Norms to DocVaues.
This is an index file format change and if you are using trunk you
need to reindex before updating.
happy indexing :)
simon
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628
Hi, good morning everyone.
I would like to ask one question about lucene index file.
I want to know whether I could customize this index file.
I know this index file is created by lucene in the backgroud from documents
directory.
And all of words and their frequence is output in the index file
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Simon can you also email java-user@ and solr-user@? Seems good to
> over-communicate when trunk index format changes...
good point, done!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Si
Simon can you also email java-user@ and solr-user@? Seems good to
over-communicate when trunk index format changes...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just committed LUCENE-3108 (Landing DocValues on Trun
Hey folks,
I just committed LUCENE-3108 (Landing DocValues on Trunk) which adds a
byte to FieldInfo.
If you are running on trunk you must / should re-index any trunk
indexes once you update to the latest trunk.
its likely if you open up old trunk (4.0) indexes, you will get an
exception related t
Hi,
2011/3/21 soheila dehghanzadeh :
> Hi All,
> I have created Index folder, and i tried to open .CFS,.CFX,.GEN, segments
> file with notpad . but they are unreadable. i want to see their structure
> for my sample directory which i have passed to Indexfiles . ihave red this
> http://lucene.apache
Hi All,
I have created Index folder, and i tried to open .CFS,.CFX,.GEN, segments
file with notpad . but they are unreadable. i want to see their structure
for my sample directory which i have passed to Indexfiles . ihave red this
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/fileformats.html and i know wha
3.1
Assignee: Mark Miller
> SEVERE: Unable to move index file from: tempfile to: indexfile
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-1822
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1822
>
hey there,
a couple of days ago the trunk index format changed with LUCENE-2881
you should re-index any trunk indexes.
its likely if you open up old trunk indexes, you will get an
exception related to Read Past EOF.
Sorry for the delay!
simon
---
jira/browse/SOLR-1995.
> SEVERE: Unable to move index file from: tempfile to: indexfile
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-1822
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1822
> Project:
a full index repl at 2010-11-22
03:10:00. And slave's repl duration is 5 minitues. So at 2010-11-22 15:10:00,
the slave made indexDirName and indexDirName both index.20101122031000, and
finnaly will drop the index.After that,replication would generate the abo
the slave made indexDirName and indexDirName both index.20101122031000, and
finnaly will drop the index.After that,replication would generate the above
error again and again.
> SEVERE: Unable to move index file from: tempfile to: indexfile
> ---
Hey folks | devs,
I just wanted to give you a heads up that the just committed
LUCENE-2741 contains a index file format change.
Codec Files will now have a codec ID in their filenames to
support codecs that use the same file extensions within a single segment.
Indexes build with Lucene TRUNK
idimagination.com
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> Hey folks | devs,
>>
>> I just wanted to give you a heads up that the just committed
>> LUCENE-2742 contains a index file format change. Indexes build with
>> Lucene T
nd
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Hey folks | devs,
>
> I just wanted to give you a heads up that the just committed
> LUCENE-2742 contains a index file format change. Indexes build with
> Lucene TRUNK will not work anymore and need
Hey folks | devs,
I just wanted to give you a heads up that the just committed
LUCENE-2742 contains a index file format change. Indexes build with
Lucene TRUNK will not work anymore and need to be reindexed. If you
are using trunk you should reindex after you update to latest trunk.
Indexes build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2528:
Component/s: Store
> CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file to be deployed as a compl
correct?
>
> SkipLevel is a sequence of SkipDatum.
>
> Though I'm not sure why that last is attached; that seems odd.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've read the index file format documentation
>>
Actually I think the docs are [close to] correct?
SkipLevel is a sequence of SkipDatum.
Though I'm not sure why that last is attached; that seems odd.
Mike
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've read the index file format documentation
> (ht
Hi
I've read the index file format documentation (
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/fileformats.html) trying to understand
something, and I spent quite a lot of time on the skip data documentation.
The definition that puzzled me is this:
SkipData --> < NumSkipLevels-1, SkipLevel>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lance Norskog updated LUCENE-2528:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2528.patch
> CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file to be deplo
the information to the compound file
header.
> CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file to be deployed as a complete
> index without segment files
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lance Norskog updated LUCENE-2528:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2528.patch)
> CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file
CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file to be deployed as a complete
index without segment files
--
Key: LUCENE-2528
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lance Norskog updated LUCENE-2528:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2528.patch
> CFSFileDirectory: Allow a Compound Index file to be deplo
39 matches
Mail list logo
