Thanks for the reply. The ticket in question is CONNECTORS-594, if you would
like to just comment there.
Karl
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: ext Ryan McKinley
Sent: 12/28/2012 4:03 PM
To: solr-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there documentation anywhere
Hi Karl-
solrj 4 (or 5!) should be able to read older instances. There are a few
catches to make that work smoothly. In particular, the binary format has
changed, so if you force things to be xml it should work OK.
I'll catch you on the manifold mailing list and help get things sorted.
ryan
On 12/28/12 3:54 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Not so perverse, really. Quite by design that Solr depends on SolrJ.
SolrJ _is_ Solr. EmbeddedSolrServer for example. The distributed
and replication aspects also rely explicitly on SolrJ for
communication and more.
I understand Karl's situation here,
On 12/28/2012 1:32 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
For the ManifoldCF project, we have an output connector for Solr, and we'd like
to port it to use SolrJ instead of homegrown code. However, I cannot find any
mention anywhere of whether anyone has tried to maintain compatibility betw
e most of the time it
> may in fact work, but it may not be guaranteed to work.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 3:32 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Is there documentation anywhere de
ranteed to work.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 3:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there documentation anywhere describing interoperability of
SolrJ?
Hi all,
For the ManifoldCF project, we have an output connecto
Hi all,
For the ManifoldCF project, we have an output connector for Solr, and we'd like
to port it to use SolrJ instead of homegrown code. However, I cannot find any
mention anywhere of whether anyone has tried to maintain compatibility between
later versions of SolrJ (e.g. 4.0.0) and previous