Yeah my bad, didnt read which list it was.
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 10:19 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Isn't this about Lucene? So 9.8 is right version.
> Am 07.07.2023 um 23:43 schrieb Houston Putman:
>
> Agreed, should be an easy change to include for 9.3.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5
Isn't this about Lucene? So 9.8 is right version.
Am 07.07.2023 um 23:43 schrieb Houston Putman:
Agreed, should be an easy change to include for 9.3.
- Houston
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
+1 to include this in release. Thanks for noticing!
On Sat, 8
Agreed, should be an easy change to include for 9.3.
- Houston
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to include this in release. Thanks for noticing!
>
> On Sat, 8 Jul, 2023, 12:33 am Mike Drob, wrote:
>
>> Why is our javadoc currently gene
+1 to include this in release. Thanks for noticing!
On Sat, 8 Jul, 2023, 12:33 am Mike Drob, wrote:
> Why is our javadoc currently generated with -noindex? I did some digging
> and found that we set that back in LUCENE-3977 to save 10MB, and then added
> a property to re-enable it in LUCENE-4237
Why is our javadoc currently generated with -noindex? I did some digging
and found that we set that back in LUCENE-3977 to save 10MB, and then added
a property to re-enable it in LUCENE-4237, but I think that got lost in the
gradle migration.
While the index might have been useless at the time, it
