https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8883 and now with a simple
patch
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:45 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1
>
> PS: Check out the template in scripts/addVersion.py which now
+1
PS: Check out the template in scripts/addVersion.py which now just adds "(no
changes)"
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 25. jun. 2019 kl. 09:02 skrev Adrien Grand :
>
> +1, it's otherwise tempting to reuse an existing category even if it
>
+1, it's otherwise tempting to reuse an existing category even if it
doesn't fit as well as a category that is not listed yet.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:40 AM David Smiley wrote:
>
> Looking at Solr's CHANGES.txt for 8.2 I see we have some sections: "Upgrade
> Notes", "New Features", "Bug
It's fine, David.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 7:40 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> Looking at Solr's CHANGES.txt for 8.2 I see we have some sections:
> "Upgrade Notes", "New Features", "Bug Fixes", and "Other Changes". There
> is no "Improvements" so no surprise here, the New Features category has
>
Looking at Solr's CHANGES.txt for 8.2 I see we have some sections: "Upgrade
Notes", "New Features", "Bug Fixes", and "Other Changes". There is no
"Improvements" so no surprise here, the New Features category has
issues that ought to be listed as such. I think the order vary as well. I
