RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 291 - Failure!

2012-08-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
g Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 291 - Failure! Hi I opened a bug report once (on that ServiceLoader issue - which got fixed !), but the process wasn't trivial, I'll need to find the instructions how to do it again :). Uwe, I run with IB

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 291 - Failure!

2012-08-09 Thread Shai Erera
Hi I opened a bug report once (on that ServiceLoader issue - which got fixed !), but the process wasn't trivial, I'll need to find the instructions how to do it again :). Uwe, I run with IBM J9 -- is there a way I can reproduce it locally? Also, what's the version it happens on (in case you're no

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 291 - Failure!

2012-08-09 Thread Michael McCandless
Alas I don't (at least I've never opened a J9 bug before!) but I believe Shai does/has. I agree we should get to the bottom of this. How much do we know about the bug...? Is it only the 32 bit JRE? I just see lots of test failures ... I haven't done any digging. Mike McCandless http://blog.mi

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 291 - Failure!

2012-08-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
Mike, Shai, Do you have contact to IBM J9 people? If yes, how can we submit a bug report. With this bug, IBM J9 is as bad as Java 7-b147 because it corrumpts packed FSTs. We should open a report! For now we can try to do the same like with the PorterStemmer bug (disabling compilation of that spe