Looks like this vote passes. Not feeling well today and have plans for the
weekend, but I'll start the publishing process as soon as I can.
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> S
+1
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> ---
Thank you Simon and Mark for making clear who should/can vote, I won't
hesitate to vote anymore.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
We consider all votes, especially any committers.
We need 3 pmc votes to get it out the door as a technical thing, but I think
all committers should vote that can.
Anyway, from my perspective as RM for this release, you have enough merit at
this point that your vote means as much to me as anyon
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Is that a +1 ? :)
>
> That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the
> counting easier since I have no binding vote (not being in Lucene
> PMC). Or does Lucene allow an
+1 The smokeReleaseTest again ran successfully.
On 27 March 2013 16:09, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller
> wrote:
> > Is that a +1 ? :)
>
> That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the
> counting easier since I have no binding vote (not bein
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Is that a +1 ? :)
That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the
counting easier since I have no binding vote (not being in Lucene
PMC). Or does Lucene allow anyone contributing to the project to vote
for releases?
--
Adrien
+1
Tommaso
2013/3/26 Mark Miller
> Is that a +1 ? :)
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > smokeTestRelease ran successfully on my machine.
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
Is that a +1 ? :)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> smokeTestRelease ran successfully on my machine.
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands
smokeTestRelease ran successfully on my machine.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
moved ES to the new RC + run smoke tester
+1 - thanks mark
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r14
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> -
+1
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:25, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-
: http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
+1 VOTE for the files with the following sha1 checksums to be released as
Lucene/Solr 4.2.1...
d5694d06dd2035949c7487f83772afc89afd3372 *lucene-4.2.1-src.tgz
ae9c8e3d0508aa1445acb6dd048bf7d6c706e882 *lucene-4.2.1.tgz
d5c4c357a
+1
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-
And now with the correct URL, smoking SUCCESS!
+1 to release RC2
Steve
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Crap, you're right, I did use the old URL. Sorry for the noise. - Steve
>
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Hmm…I think you used the wrong URL perhap
Crap, you're right, I did use the old URL. Sorry for the noise. - Steve
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Hmm…I think you used the wrong URL perhaps? That's yesterdays date and I
> re-spun this morning.
>
>> 4.2.1 1460908 - mark - 2013-03-25 21:05:08
>
>
> Also, when I looke
Hmm…I think you used the wrong URL perhaps? That's yesterdays date and I
re-spun this morning.
> 4.2.1 1460908 - mark - 2013-03-25 21:05:08
Also, when I looked at MANIFEST.MF, I see:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
Created-By: 1.6.0_27-b27 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Extensi
Must have missed an svn update before I ran it in the 4x branch (re-running to
be sure).
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Here's MANIFEST.MF contents:
>
> -
> Manifest-Version: 1.0
> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
> Created-By: 1.7.0_15-b20 (Oracle Corporation)
> Ext
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> We did not backport the smoketester changes to 4.2 branch, so smoketester
> will still pass when wrong java version would have been used.
>
> Uwe
I ran the smoketester script from both 4.2 branch and 4.x branch (with Mike's
new java vers
Here's MANIFEST.MF contents:
-
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
Created-By: 1.7.0_15-b20 (Oracle Corporation)
Extension-Name: org.apache.lucene
Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine: analyzers-common
Specification-Version: 4.2.1
Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software
Smoke tester (from branch_4x r1461125) says:
RuntimeError: JAR file
"/Users/sarowe/temp/smokeTestTmpDir/unpack/lucene-4.2.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-4.2.1.jar"
is missing "Created-By: 1.6" inside its META-INF/MANIFES.MF
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://p
Hi Makr,
Thanks for the quick rebuild, that’s really fast! Java version and our Javadocs
(in the good old 1.6 look without fancy CSS) are correct now :-) I will do
further checking now.
We did not backport the smoketester changes to 4.2 branch, so smoketester will
still pass when wrong java ve
23 matches
Mail list logo
