Good! I'm +1 although I did not do any testing other than using latest 3x
branch locally.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 13. sep. 2011, at 12:33, Michael McCandless wrote:
> This VOTE has passed!
>
> I'll annou
This VOTE has passed!
I'll announce/publish.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~mik
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
+1
-Yonik
http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Co
I was confused about this. I thought the join contrib was released
with 3.3 release, but it wasn't. So we should highlight it now!
On 12 September 2011 18:41, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Martijn v Groningen
> wrote:
>> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
>> The Lu
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Martijn v Groningen
wrote:
> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
> The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
> module.
By release notes, you mean the draft 3.4 release announcement, ie this
wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/
+1
All tests pass on Linux 32-bit, 64-bit and Mac.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 a
+1 All tests passed on my machine.
The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
module. I assume this will be removed, right?
On 12 September 2011 09:03, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> +1 Changes look fine, tests work I beasted them for a couple of hours.
>
> thanks mike!
>
> On Mo
+1 Changes look fine, tests work I beasted them for a couple of hours.
thanks mike!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> +1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
>
> Shai
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to release.
>>
>>
+1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
Shai
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1 to release.
>
> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011
+1 to release.
I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-re
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Changes look fine, one small thing: We have Java 7 try-with-resources
> support now (our first Java 7 feature!!!), but the note is at wrong position
> (under BUG FIXES):
> "LUCENE-3334: If Java7 is detected, IOUtils.closeSafely() will log
>
+1
Used this build in my classes today at NFJS Boston (sorry Mike - no time to say
hi). Solr worked just fine.
Erik
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:06, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-
Hi,
+1
I checked the Lucene Core JAR file as drop-in replacement for PANGAEA, works
without any problem. Did reindex some documents, checkindexed, optimized,
checkindexed again. All fine, no 1.6.0_24 crashes all is working as it
should. Code compiles fine, too. We are running now on this version
I prepared a PyLucene 3.4 release candidate from the Lucene 3.4 branch.
All tests pass.
+1 to release Lucene Solr 3.4.
Andi..
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:06, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-sol
+1
all tests on all Lucene-using projects I contribute to pass without
any change needed (a sure sign I should add more...).
Once more, great work and thank so much to everyone involved.
Sanne
On 11 September 2011 16:11, Robert Muir wrote:
> +1, thanks for creating this release candidate.
>
> O
+1, thanks for creating this release candidate.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandles
Thanks Ryan. I think I understand.
Can you help me with this ?
Bill
On 9/8/11 1:15 PM, "Ryan McKinley" wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
>>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>>
>> Sorr
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>
> Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
>
>> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinle
No problem, thanks Adriano!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Adriano Crestani
wrote:
> Hi,
> I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
> I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
> Sorry for taking so long to
Hi,
I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
Sorry for taking so long to commit these changes, just realized now 3.4 was
that close :(
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Thanks Mike
>
> Indeed
Thanks Mike
Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemcc
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I reviewed and overall looks good.
>
> I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
> in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
Thanks Shai!
> However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
> complains about validation stuff. I wi
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>
> I thought we had something
on vacation…)
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
> To: dev@
ail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:10 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too fast J
(I am still on va
minutes.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:49 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] R
I reviewed and overall looks good.
I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
in to 3x and 3.4 branch. However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
know what happened - it used to work in t
Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to
phi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this
is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Breme
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this
is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/stag
30 matches
Mail list logo
