Message-
> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 8:13 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only
> #3430
>
> I'm pretty sure the AMBFR isn't being using on flon
PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only
#3430
I'm pretty sure the AMBFR isn't being using on flonkings. I don't have access,
so I haven't put it there. - Steve
-Original Message-
From: Micha
uil...@flonkings.com; sim...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only
#3430
Also, it looks like that awesome, massive build failure regexp is
failing to properly splice out this failure?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Aug
Also, it looks like that awesome, massive build failure regexp is
failing to properly splice out this failure?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1 to remove it.
>
> But why doesn't it fail all the time...?
>
> Mike McCa
+1 to remove it.
But why doesn't it fail all the time...?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I think this test method is useless and we should remove it.
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, wrote:
>> See
>>
>> --
I think this test method is useless and we should remove it.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, wrote:
> See
>
> --
> [...truncated 1008 lines...]
> [junit4:junit4] Completed on J5 in 0.43s, 4 tests
> [junit4:junit4]
> [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.luce
