This is another indicator that we should really try to extract Solr's
capabilities like Faceting into modules! Solr should not be required
if you want to use the facteing stuff we already have.
simon
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Wouter Heijke wrote:
> Hi,
> Same here, don't want Solr, so if
che.org
> Cc: java-dev
> Subject: Re: Facet search
>
> This is another indicator that we should really try to extract Solr's
> capabilities
> like Faceting into modules! Solr should not be required if you want to use the
> facteing stuff we already have.
>
> simon
&
sage-
> > From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:31 AM
> > To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org
> > Cc: java-dev
> > Subject: Re: Facet search
> >
> > This is another indicator that we should really try
