Hi,
> I don't know
> enough about finer points of shutdown hooks to comment on the distinctio,
> but my off the cuff assumption is that a shutdown hook would be a bad idea
> ... in a long running program wouldn't thta keep the IndexWriter
> from being GCed until shutdown?
>
Could be, haven't use
: I think finalize() is that not trustworthy, in that it may
: never be called, e.g. in case GC happened to not collect the specific
: object,
: and so the way for programmers to guarantee execution of any code
: at shutdown is with shutdown hooks, I guess this is that what you meant,
i'm not sug
: I like Uwe's idea. As for Hoss's original suggestion, my initial
: reaction is that if a user understands the need to set the option
: in the first place, they're also more likely to understand the need
: for close().
my intention was that if the user used a "novice" type API for getting an
In
I like Uwe's idea. As for Hoss's original suggestion, my initial
reaction is that if a user understands the need to set the option
in the first place, they're also more likely to understand the need
for close().
FWIW
Erick
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I know t
Hi,
> I know there were good reasons for eliminating the "autoCommit"
> functionality from IndexWriter, but threads like tis make me thing thta
even
> though "autoCommit" on flush/merge/whatever was bad, having an option
> for some sort of "autoClose" using a finalizer might by a good idea to
give
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Anyone see a downside?
>
I don't think we should do anything serious in a gc finalizer.
sounds like its asking for a JRE crash.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Hi,
> > I know there were good reasons for eliminating the "autoCommit"
> > functionality from IndexWriter, but threads like tis make me thing thta
> > even though "autoCommit" on flush/merge/whatever was bad, having an
> option
> > for some sort of "autoClose" using a finalizer might by a good i
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:21, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> (replying to the dev list, see context below)
>
> : Unfortunately, you can't easily recover from this (except by
> : reindexing your docs again).
> :
> : Failing to call IW.commit() or IW.close() means no segments file was
> written...
>
>
(replying to the dev list, see context below)
: Unfortunately, you can't easily recover from this (except by
: reindexing your docs again).
:
: Failing to call IW.commit() or IW.close() means no segments file was
written...
I know there were good reasons for eliminating the "autoCommit"
func
