08, 2013 12:15 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Can we make it fail only for "precommit" but pass on "Jenkins". I don't want
> extra -D overri
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:16 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
>
> Thats a nice idea: fail by default (for developers) but have a -D for jenkins.
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> > I understand. Is it
remen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
** **
*From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 08, 2013 6:09 AM
*To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
** **
Uwe, I think that having another ant task e.g. precommit-lenient
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 08, 2013 6:09 AM
>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 6:09 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
Uwe, I think that having another ant task e.g. precommit-lenient/forgiving that
Jenkins would use is a good idea too.
As long as for developers, precommit fails if it didn't run all t
; From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:15 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Can we make it fail only for "pre
Uwe, I think that having another ant task e.g. precommit-lenient/forgiving
that Jenkins would use is a good idea too.
As long as for developers, precommit fails if it didn't run all tests.
Shai
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Can we make it fail only for "precommit" but pass on "Jenkins". I don't want
> extra -D overrides for Jenkins, the task "Jenkins" should trigger this
> automatically. Its horrible to configure otherwise, especially when you have
> lots of j
ginal Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:16 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
>
> Thats a nice idea: fail by default (for developers) but have a -D for jenkins.
>
> On Thu, Feb
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:41 PM
>> To: dev
Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:41 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
>
> ** **
>
> I see, but is it possible to FAIL the build in that case? I ran with
> Oracle's 1.6.0 and it was ok
>
> Shai
>
> ** **
>
&
-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:41 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: documentation-lint and IBM J9
I see, but is it possible to FAIL the build i
I see, but is it possible to FAIL the build in that case? I ran with
Oracle's 1.6.0 and it was ok
Shai
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> We ran the llinter with IBM J9 on the Policeman Jenkins server, but the
> generated Javadocs were full of borken links and invalid HTML
We ran the llinter with IBM J9 on the Policeman Jenkins server, but the
generated Javadocs were full of borken links and invalid HTML. So it looks like
the Javadoc generator of IBM J9 is not compatible with the python checker.
This is why it is disabled.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-
There are some problems with some of the JVMs, i wonder if IBM 1.6.0 is ok.
I know for a fact that Oracle's 1.6.0 JVM generates lots of broken
html that causes false failures.
We should test IBM's to see if its 1.6 is ok... if so only disable it
for Oracle's 1.6
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM, S
15 matches
Mail list logo
