Re: Lucene 10

Thanks Mike and Dawid for the kind words, and thanks Patrick, Luca and Egor for your interest in decoupling index geometry from search concurrency, this would be a great release highlight if we can get it into Lucene 10! I haven't seen pushback on the proposed schedule so I plan on proceeding

Re: Lucene 10

> > [...] but Adrien I don't honestly believe anyone who is > paying attention thinks that is what you have been doing! +1. I wish I were procrastinating as productively! D.

Re: Lucene 10

Hey Patrick, your help on search concurrency will be much appreciated :) I have some very hacky branch that I'd like to use as a base for discussion of the issues I found and needed adjustments. Lots to do there. I will ping you once I put up a draft PR. Cheers Luca On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:55 

Re: Lucene 10

Thanks Adrien +1 to the timelines. I'm also willing to work on/ review the Decouple search concurrency from index geometry task, that's a very nice one to have for those latency sensitive applications (rather than have to tune merge policy case by

Re: Lucene 10

timing makes sense to me. +1 for having a deadline to reduce procrastination, but Adrien I don't honestly believe anyone who is paying attention thinks that is what you have been doing! On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:40 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > It's been ~2.5 years since we