Re: Serializable SpellCheckResponse

2011-08-13 Thread Gregor Kaczor
I opened a JIRA issue for : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2710 You are right about LoadableDetachableModel, i had a look at it. It is an option but this solution would put unnecessary load on the index servers and network which i would like to avoid. After all local serialisation

Re: Serializable SpellCheckResponse

2011-08-12 Thread Ryan McKinley
I don't think there is a reason -- maybe open a JIRA issue for this. For wicket, i would recommend looking at LoadableDetachableModel this will make the query once for each request and avoid serializing the results On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Gregor Kaczor wrote: > I am using apache wicke

Serializable SpellCheckResponse

2011-08-12 Thread Gregor Kaczor
I am using apache wicket and apache solr. In wicket i am passing QueryResponse to several classes which worked fine until I started using SpellChecking. Wicket is serializing objects in order to store them between requests. QueryResponse implements Serializable but SpellCheckResponse which is a