Re: Status of solr tests

2018-07-17 Thread Steve Rowe
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 8:29 AM, David Smiley wrote: > > I'm +1 to modify the Lucene-side JIRA QA bot (Yetus) to not execute Solr > tests. Right now, Yetus only executes Solr tests when there is a Solr change in the patch; otherwise only Lucene tests are executed. I just committed a

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-20 Thread Simon Willnauer
;> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: >>> Erick- >>> >>> appears that style mis-application may be categorised as INFO >>> are mixed in with SEVERE errors >>> >>> Would it make sense to filter the er

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-19 Thread Erick Erickson
.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/Level.html >> Level (Java Platform SE 7 ) - Oracle Help Center >> docs.oracle.com >> The Level class defines a set of standard logging levels that can be used to >> control logging output. The logging Level objects are o

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-19 Thread Steve Rowe
t; >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: >>> Erick- >>> >>> appears that style mis-application may be categorised as INFO >>> are mixed in with SEVERE errors >>> >>> Would it make sense to

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-19 Thread Simon Willnauer
gt; >> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/Level.html >> Level (Java Platform SE 7 ) - Oracle Help Center >> docs.oracle.com >> The Level class defines a set of standard logging levels that can be used to >> control logging output. The logging

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-19 Thread Steve Rowe
g Level objects are ordered and are > specified by ordered integers. > if you know Severity you can triage the SEVERE errors before working down to > INFO errors > > > WDYT? > Martin > __ > > > > From: Erick Erickson &g

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Erick Erickson
y you can triage the SEVERE errors before working down > to INFO errors > > WDYT? > Martin > __ > > > > > -- > *From:* Erick Erickson > *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM > *To:* de

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Robert Muir
___ > > > > > -- > *From:* Erick Erickson > *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org; Mark Miller > *Subject:* Re: Status of solr tests > > Mark (and everyone). > > I'm trying to be somewhat conservativ

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Martin Gainty
triage the SEVERE errors before working down to INFO errors WDYT? Martin __ From: Erick Erickson Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org; Mark Miller Subject: Re: Status of solr tests Mark (and ev

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Erick Erickson
;> > the practical reality is that it won't be good enough anytime soon. >> > When we >> > get there, we can reverse this. >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> folks, >> >&

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Mark Miller
Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer < > simon.willna...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> folks, > >> > >> I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the > >> last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjo

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Erick Erickson
ri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer > wrote: >> >> folks, >> >> I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the >> last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjoy it. The >> one thing that is IMO not acceptable is

Re: Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread David Smiley
there, we can reverse this. On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer wrote: > folks, > > I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the > last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjoy it. The > one thing that is IMO not acceptable is the

Status of solr tests

2018-06-15 Thread Simon Willnauer
folks, I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjoy it. The one thing that is IMO not acceptable is the status of solr tests. I tried so many times to get them passing on several different OSs but it seems