Re: Lots of failures lately for lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatability.testAllVersionsTested

2020-05-16 Thread Erick Erickson
OK, I’ll give it a rest until tomorrow and look again, thanks! > On May 16, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > > I thinks it’s fixed now. The 7.7.3 version was missing. > > Simon > > >> On 16. May 2020, at 22:45, Erick Erickson wrote: >> >> Unfortunately the seed doesn’t

Re: [DISCUSS] 8.5.2 Release?

2020-05-16 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Mike, I'm about to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Mike Drob wrote: > Thanks for pointing those commits out to me, Noble. I cherry-picked the > doap and backcompat index changes to branch_8 and master. > > As for the releases... > >

Re: [DISCUSS] 8.5.2 Release?

2020-05-16 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Done. On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 1:49 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Mike, I'm about to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471 > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Mike Drob wrote: > >> Thanks for pointing those commits out to me, Noble. I cherry-picked the >> doap and

Re: Lots of failures lately for lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatability.testAllVersionsTested

2020-05-16 Thread Simon Willnauer
I thinks it’s fixed now. The 7.7.3 version was missing. Simon > On 16. May 2020, at 22:45, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Unfortunately the seed doesn’t reproduce, and I tried beasting it without > getting any fails in 700 iterations (and counting). > > Here’s one example, I see three others in

Lots of failures lately for lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatability.testAllVersionsTested

2020-05-16 Thread Erick Erickson
Unfortunately the seed doesn’t reproduce, and I tried beasting it without getting any fails in 700 iterations (and counting). Here’s one example, I see three others in the last couple of hours. I’ve done zero investigation into where these are coming from, but I did notice there started being

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

2020-05-16 Thread Dennis Gove
For the reasons I included in my message on the discussion thread ( https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202005.mbox/%3CCAPsCRSWds%3Dctvf837BFRXqyPxGLJ-5a%2B3hCa6HwrA8FFR5MQkA%40mail.gmail.com%3E) I'm voting in favor of this. I hope the actual execution of it will follow the path

Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene-Solr split (Solr promoted to TLP)

2020-05-16 Thread Dennis Gove
There’s something enticing when thinking of Lucene and Solr as independent codebases. I’ve always thought of Lucene as core search (indexing, analysis, tokenization, etc…) and Solr as a search experience. Lucene is more a library (or set of libraries) used by applications providing search

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

2020-05-16 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
+1 (binding) On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:07 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Dear Lucene and Solr developers! > > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

2020-05-16 Thread cdoronc
+1 (binding) for Solr to become TLP (and for separating the two projects from each other) Regards, Doron -- Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: