Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Anshum Gupta
Fast-track please :) On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish > tomorrow, and not wait for Friday. > The release voting rules are three or more +1 votes and more +1 votes than > -1 votes, so for the vote to fail

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Mike Drob
Fast track please On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:34 PM Gus Heck wrote: > fast track please :) > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:23 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Fast-track please :) >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl >> wrote: >> >>> Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish tomorrow, and not wait for Friday. The release voting rules are three or more +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes, so for the vote to fail we'd need more than 11 -1's from now :) If I see at least 3 more of you in favor

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Gus Heck
fast track please :) On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:23 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Fast-track please :) > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish >> tomorrow, and not wait for Friday. >> The release voting rules are

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
Thanks all, I'll close the vote now and start publishing the release... If you're a PMC member who planned to vote, but have not yet done so, there is still value in expressing your vote in this thread, further validating the release. I'll tally the final count tomorrow as well, for the record.

Re: Article link at Lucene FAQ does not exist anymore

2021-12-15 Thread Michael Wechner
I have removed it now :-) Am 22.11.21 um 18:18 schrieb Michael Wechner: Hi The QnA https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/lucene/lucenefaq#LuceneFAQ-HowcanIindexXMLdocuments? is pointing to (See also this article Parsing, indexing, and searching XML with Digester and Lucene

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 from me from smoke test result: SUCCESS! [0:43:56.320467] It failed the first time with this failure, but I re-ran and succeeded above: [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.JWTIssuerConfigTest [junit4] 2> 996270 INFO (SUITE-JWTIssuerConfigTest-seed#[6DC363670E25C70C]-worker) [

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
If anyone wants to test RC1 in Docker or solr-operator, here is an image: cominvent/solr:8.11.1-rc1 Example: docker run --rm -p 8983:8983 cominvent/solr:8.11.1-rc1 -c Jan > 15. des. 2021 kl. 13:17 skrev Michael McCandless : > > +1 from me from smoke test result: > > SUCCESS!

RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true is set

2021-12-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
We should add this to the webpage. Another one asked on the security mailing list. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Gus Heck Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 12:39 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Log4j <

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, Policeman Jenkins tested the relaese with Smoketester: SUCCESS! [1:28:23.237262] Finished: SUCCESS https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Release-Tester/38/console I did not do futher checks, I just want to get the release out soon! Thanks to Jan to do the release so fast. In the

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
I think ASF allows exception to the 72h voting rule for urgent fixes. The current vote result is 7 "+1" and no "-1". So if we figure out how to trigger that exception we could push it e.g. tomorrow instad of Friday? Jan > 15. des. 2021 kl. 15:29 skrev Uwe Schindler : > > Hi, > > Policeman

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread David Smiley
+1 SUCCESS! [1:27:33.004868] ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:17 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I think ASF allows exception to the 72h voting rule for urgent fixes. The > current vote result is 7 "+1" and no

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Dawid Weiss
SUCCESS! [0:56:37.756257] +1 On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:36 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >

RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true is set

2021-12-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi all, I prepared a PR about the followup CVE-2021-45046: https://github.com/apache/solr-site/pull/59 Please verify and make suggestion. I will merge this into main/production later. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Gus Heck
+1 (binding) smoke tester pass, local 4 node cluster started via cloud.sh (-r to build from local check out of 0b002b11819df70783e83ef36b42ed1223c14b50) created 2 collections added one doc to each, queried each and both via an alias. On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:17 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Anshum Gupta
+1 (binding) Smoke tester is happy. SUCCESS! [1:03:13.162577] Also tested out a sample search/indexing app. On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:36 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Will do! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Timothy Potter > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:19 PM > To: lucene dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1 > > Anyone try

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I was able to start the solr.cmd and boot up techproducts. I also quickly checked the changed endpoints like "export", "status", "api". Only "autoscaling" showed exceptions about zookeeper, not sure if this should show some help info instead (I ran scripts without any solr node running)..

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Timothy Potter
Anyone try manually launching the RC on Windows? There's a change to bin/solr.cmd in this release. I tested before I committed but always good to re-test with the RC just in case. Tim On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > SUCCESS! [0:56:37.756257] > > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 14,

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Timothy Potter
Awesome, thanks Uwe! On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 1:39 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > I was able to start the solr.cmd and boot up techproducts. I also quickly > checked the changed endpoints like "export", "status", "api". Only > "autoscaling" showed exceptions about zookeeper, not sure if

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Houston Putman
SUCCESS! [1:10:32.826846] Also ran Jan's docker image using the Solr Operator and everything looked good to me. I also tested some of the fixes included in the release. +1 (binding) - Houston On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:42 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > Awesome, thanks Uwe! > > On Wed, Dec 15,

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1

2021-12-15 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
I think we should publish, release and announce asap, not waiting for 72h or the MVN propogation. On Thu, 16 Dec, 2021, 2:40 am Anshum Gupta, wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Smoke tester is happy. > > SUCCESS! [1:03:13.162577] > > Also tested out a sample search/indexing app. > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2

2021-12-15 Thread Andi Vajda
This vote has passed ! Thank you all who voted. The PyLucene 8.11.0 release artifacts should be available shortly. Andi.. On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Andi Vajda wrote: The rc1 vote failed because of a bug fix in JCC that helps with detecting the Temurin JDK - available from https://adoptium.net.