Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

Ahem ... unfortunately there will not be an 8.10 RC this week. I'm headed out on vacation tomorrow, back at keys on Monday, Sept 20 unless someone else wants to pick up the RM duties before then? After failing the test suite at various places and other weirdness like .asc files not getting

Re: Question - LUCENE-9077

> I see on the issue it mentions "See notes below on why this respin is > needed." > I can't remember what I meant by that, to be honest... > I'm not able to find the notes mentioned that talk about the reasons for > the changes which would be nice to be able to look over... but I might just >

Re: Java 11/17 Version Matrix

Let's wait for this functionality and see what happens. If the gain is significant then this provides an incentive to upgrade for everyone. MR-JARs will be a pain to keep consistent... Dawid On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > I think we should discuss options when Project

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

All the best, this is the worst step. On Tue, 14 Sep, 2021, 10:47 pm Timothy Potter, wrote: > Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update Mike! > > > > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking up a quick

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > > Thanks for the update Mike! > > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking up a quick PR for > SOLR-15621, which looks like an easy win for the issue Cassandra > reported on Slack earlier today. >

Question - LUCENE-9077

Hello, had a few questions regarding the work done on: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9077 I see on the issue it mentions "See notes below on why this respin is needed." I'm not able to find the notes mentioned that talk about the reasons for the changes which would be nice to be

Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17

Hi Uwe & Dawid, *Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17 * ** * JDK 17, the reference implementation of Java 17, is now Generally Available. [1] * GPL-licensed OpenJDK builds from Oracle are available here: https://jdk.java.net/17/ *

Re: Java 11/17 Version Matrix

Sorry, this is a bogus argument. Nobody is holding a gun to anyone's head and forcing them to upgrade. When we have new major functionality, we should be able to issue new major releases, to hell with elasticsearch users. On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > I think we should

Re: getField vs getDeclaredField in analysis SPI

Thanks for opening the issue Uwe! I agree that option #1 is the best long term fix (although for the moment I’ve wrapped the relevant ES code in a doPrivileged block which solves the immediate problem). > Is Elasticsearch now using the Analysis Factory framework instead of their > own

Re: Java 11/17 Version Matrix

I think we should discuss options when Project Panama is released. Doing frequent major releases forces users to reindex more often. If Project Panama was released shortly and we decided to release Lucene 10 immediately, this would force users to reindex their 8.x data to be able to upgrade, I