Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Sokolov
SUCCESS! [0:53:26.276923] +1 On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:36 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > > +1 (binding) > SUCCESS! [1:21:09.867850] > > + kicked the tires on the UI locally and deployed to EKS using the > Solr operator! > > Cheers, > Tim > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 4:15 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

2021-11-10 Thread Timothy Potter
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:21:09.867850] + kicked the tires on the UI locally and deployed to EKS using the Solr operator! Cheers, Tim On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 4:15 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:06:33.517455] > > Jan > > 9. nov. 2021 kl. 21:50 skrev Adrien Grand : > > Please vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

2021-11-10 Thread Jan Høydahl
+1 SUCCESS! [1:06:33.517455] Jan > 9. nov. 2021 kl. 21:50 skrev Adrien Grand : > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >

Re: Add custom merge policy to Lucene sandbox ?

2021-11-10 Thread Adrien Grand
+1 The entry bar for the sandbox is very low, it's a good place for experimental functionality. We can then look into folding it into the default merge policy if that makes sense. Le mer. 10 nov. 2021 à 08:49, Anand Kotriwal a écrit : > Hi, > > We (at Amazon product search) have customized

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

2021-11-10 Thread Atri Sharma
+1 SUCCESS! [1:06:45.039403] On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:02 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:03:16.453882] > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:31 AM Gus Heck wrote: >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:16.982080] >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM Mayya Sharipova >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

2021-11-10 Thread Ignacio Vera
+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:16.453882] On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:31 AM Gus Heck wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:16.982080] > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:09:47.023515] >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:42 PM Timothy Potter >> wrote: >> >>> totally unofficial,