This failed with an OOM, internally. There's a lot of noise after that...
I'm not sure if there's anything to be done here about it.
Dawid
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:17 PM Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows/310/
>
The goals / purpose of "Reproducible Builds" makes sense to me.
However I wish the output that is the subject of reproducibility could be
the JAR *exclusive* of its MANIFEST.MF. There is some interesting metadata
in there -- not essential but a shame to throw away in the name of
reproducibility.
Some discussion on https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12096 lead to the
question of whether or not reproducible builds (
https://reproducible-builds.org/) are something we would like to work
towards. I'm a fan, though unlikely to have time to work on it soon.
What I can do is monitor this
I tried to understand the issue described on github, but unfortunately
do not really understand it.
Can you explain a little more?
Thanks
Michael
Am 21.01.23 um 11:00 schrieb Alessandro Benedetti:
Hi,
this would be nice to have in 9.5 :
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12099
It's
Hi,
this would be nice to have in 9.5 :
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12099
It's a minor (adding getters to KnnQuery) but can be beneficial in Apache
Solr as soon as possible.
Planning to merge in a few hours if no objections.
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @
