did you add to the sandbox META-INF file? It looks like maybe sandbox is
not included in the scope of the test, but you didn't say which test it
was. Is the test also in the sandbox module?
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:56 PM Dongyu Xu wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I tried to plug in my experimental
+1, thank you Chris!
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 06:49 Benjamin Trent wrote:
> +1 9.9 will be a stellar release!
>
> Thank you Chris!
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a
>> RM, Chris.
>>
>> It would be
+1 9.9 will be a stellar release!
Thank you Chris!
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a
> RM, Chris.
>
> It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was
> introduced since 9.8:
>
+1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a RM,
Chris.
It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was introduced
since 9.8: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/PKLookup.html.
Is it just about getting #12699
+1
Thank you for volunteering as RC Chris!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 4:52 AM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been a while since the 9.8.0 release and we’ve accumulated quite a
> few changes. I’d like to propose that we release 9.9.0.
>
> If
Hi,
It's been a while since the 9.8.0 release and we’ve accumulated quite a few
changes. I’d like to propose that we release 9.9.0.
If there's no objections, I volunteer to be the release manager and will cut
the feature branch a week from now, 12:00 28th Nov UTC.
-Chris.
