Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.x - Build # 7134 - Unstable!

2023-12-11 Thread Greg Miller
I was able to repro locally and track this down to an invalid test assumption that incorrectly relies on doc ordering. We can relax some of the randomness in the test case to ensure the doc ordering, but I think the right thing to do is to relax the test assertions instead. The failing assertion

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.x - Build # 7134 - Unstable!

2023-12-11 Thread Greg Miller
Shoot, looking into this. This is a new test I added a month ago in GH#12640. Not sure if we hit a random bug in the test or if the bug fix I made in that change was incomplete somehow and this uncovered it. Cheers, -Greg On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:17 AM Apache Jenkins Server <

Re: The need for a Lucene 9.9.1 release

2023-12-11 Thread Chris Hegarty
Just a quick update on this... > On 9 Dec 2023, at 09:09, Chris Hegarty wrote: > > Hi, > > We’ve encounter two very serious issues with the recent Lucene 9.9.0 release, > both of which (even if taken by themselves) would warrant a 9.9.1. The issues > are: > > 1.

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1209 - Unstable!

2023-12-11 Thread Adrien Grand
Woops, sorry for suggesting this change in the first place! I didn't know we had this validation for points, but not for postings. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:16 PM Michael McCandless wrote: > OK I reverted the "optimization" to not pull FieldInfo for a field when > getting Points values from