Re: Welcome Stefan Vodita as Lucene committter

Welcome Stefan! On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 18:21 Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Welcome, Stefan! > Dawid > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:54 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted the Lucene PMC's >> invitation to

Re: Index ordinal data in the taxonomy

ceting > aggregation example in my previous email. Even if that isn't the case, the > taxonomy solution is more convenient and less burdensome from an > operational > standpoint. > > > I hope that's useful. Thanks again for the feedback, > > Stefan > > On Thu,

Re: Index ordinal data in the taxonomy

Hi Stefan, This sounds interesting and useful. It's like static scores for Lucene documents, only that we will apply them to ordinals. Since I assume it's not a very common use case though, do you know if this new functionality affects existing use cases? For example, will it change the API in

Re: [Proposal] Remove max number of dimensions for KNN vectors

Putting ChatGPT aside, what are the implications of (1) removing the limit, or (2) increasing the limit, or (3) make it configurable at the app's discretion? The configuration can even be in the form of a VectorEncoder impl which will decide on the size of the vectors, thereby making it clearer

Re: [Proposal] Remove max number of dimensions for KNN vectors

I am not familiar with the internal implementation details, but is it possible to refactor the code such that someone can provide an extension of some VectorEncoder/Decoder and control the limits on their side? Rather than Lucene committing to some arbitrary limit (which these days seems to keep

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

for that so far. > > On 27 Jun 2022, at 12:46, Shai Erera wrote: > > Thanks Alan, yeah I guess I was thinking about the usecase I described, > which involves (usually) simple term queries, but you're definitely right > about complex boolean clauses as well non-term queries. >

Re: Store arrays in DocValues and keep the original order

Depending on what you use the field for, you can use BinaryDocValuesField which encodes a byte[] and lets you store the data however you want. But how are you using these fields later at search time? On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 3:46 PM linfeng lu wrote: > Hi~ > > We are trying to build an OLAP

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

to handle these weird corner cases - I had written > highlighters which more or less did the same thing you describe with a > Collector and the Scorable tree, and I would occasionally get bad > highlights back. > > > > On 27 Jun 2022, at 10:51, Shai Erera wrote: > >

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

st collects all named query instances found in query tree. I think their > implementation somehow the wrapper query scorer impl adds the name to some > global state. > > Uwe > Am 27.06.2022 um 11:51 schrieb Shai Erera: > > Out of curiosity and for education purposes, is the Collector app

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

Out of curiosity and for education purposes, is the Collector approach I proposed wrong/inefficient? Or less efficient than the matches() API? I'm thinking, if you want to both match/rank documents and as a side effect know which fields matched, the Collector will perform better than

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

Hi Yichen, I think you can implement a custom Collector which tracks the fields that were matched for each Scorer. I implemented an example such Collector below: public class FieldMatchingCollector implements Collector { /** Holds the number of matching documents for each field. */ public

Re: Plan for GitHub issue metadata management

Can we support "Affects Versions" with a label too? "affectsVersion: 8.x"? Regarding Fix Versions, don't we have multiple of these sometimes? E.g. a bug fix may go into "8.1", "9.x" and "main"? Is it OK if we just drop support for this? On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:33 PM Tomoko Uchida wrote: >

Re: Welcome Greg Miller to the Lucene PMC

Welcome Greg! On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:17 PM Bruno Roustant wrote: > Welcome Greg! > > Le mar. 7 juin 2022 à 08:37, Adrien Grand a écrit : > >> I'm pleased to announce that Greg Miller has accepted an invitation to >> join the Lucene PMC! >> >> Congratulations Greg, and welcome aboard! >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

I agree this is a procedural vote. Here's my +1 for the proposal. Shai On Tue, May 12, 2020, 23:07 Simon Willnauer wrote: > I agree this is not a code change category vote. It’s a majority vote. -1s > are not vetos. > > Simon > > On 12. May 2020, at 21:17, Atri Sharma wrote: > >  > I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene-Solr split (Solr promoted to TLP)

Interesting data Michael. I am not sure though that the shared commits tell us that there are people that contribute to both projects. Eventually, an API change/update in Lucene will require a change in Solr (but not vice versa). Those commits will still occur in both projects, only on the Solr

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski to the PMC

Congratulations Jason! On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 23:20 Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome Jason! > > *  *Anshum > > > On Feb 22, 2019, at 7:21 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Jason Gerlowski has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Jason! >

Re: Welcome Nick Knize to the PMC

Welcome! On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:30 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > Welcome Nick! > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 01/09/19 15:12:38 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Welcome Nick Knize to the PMC > > I am pleased to announce that Nick

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8588) Replace usage of deprecated RAMOutputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-8588. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 7.7 master (8.0) > Replace us

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8588) Replace usage of deprecated RAMOutputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16708780#comment-16708780 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-8588: [~dweiss] thanks for pointing that out. I will not commit

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8588) Replace usage of deprecated RAMOutputStream

Shai Erera created LUCENE-8588: -- Summary: Replace usage of deprecated RAMOutputStream Key: LUCENE-8588 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8588 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8397) Add DirectoryTaxonomyWriter.getCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16542887#comment-16542887 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-8397: +1 > Add DirectoryTaxonomyWriter.getCa

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8272) Share internal DV update code between binary and numeric

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449891#comment-16449891 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-8272: I put some comments on the PR, but I don't see them mentioned

Re: Welcome to the PMC

Welcome! On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 01:22 Mark Miller wrote: > Welcome! > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Cao Mạnh Đạt has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> >> Welcome Đạt! >> > -- > - Mark >

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski as committer

Welcome! On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, 20:56 Joel Bernstein wrote: > Welcome Jason! > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Congratulations Jason! :-) >> >> On Thu, Feb 8,

Re: Welcome Jim Ferenczi to the PMC

Welcome! On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:07 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Welcome! > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Joel Bernstein > wrote: > > Welcome Jim! > > > > Joel Bernstein > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:12

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8060) Require users to tell us whether they need total hit counts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16263175#comment-16263175 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-8060: What if we conceptually remove {{TopDocs.totalHits

Re: Welcome Noble Paul to the PMC

Welcome Noble! On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:54 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome Noble! > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Nov 19, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Noble Paul has accepted the PMC's

Re: Welcome Mike Drob as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Mike! On Tue, May 9, 2017, 03:47 Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Congrats Mike! > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:35 AM Dennis Gove wrote: > >> Welcome Mike! >> >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Mark Miller >> wrote: >> >>> I'm

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10505) Support terms' statistics for multiple fields in TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved SOLR-10505. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 Pushed to master

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10505) Support terms' statistics for multiple fields in TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15973296#comment-15973296 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-10505: --- All tests pass, if there are no objections, I'd like to commit

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10505) Support terms' statistics for multiple fields in TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-10505: -- Attachment: SOLR-10505.patch Patch with tests. > Support terms' statistics for multiple fie

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10505) Support terms' statistics for multiple fields in TermsComponent

Shai Erera created SOLR-10505: - Summary: Support terms' statistics for multiple fields in TermsComponent Key: SOLR-10505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10505 Project: Solr

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved SOLR-10349. --- Resolution: Fixed Pushed to master and branch_6x. > Add totalTermFreq support to TermsCompon

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-10349: -- Fix Version/s: 6.6 master (7.0) > Add totalTermFreq support to TermsCompon

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15941838#comment-15941838 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-10349: --- If there are no objections, I'd like to commit that tomorrow

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-10349: -- Attachment: SOLR-10349.patch That was a good comment [~joel.bernstein]!! I changed more code to adapt

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15938277#comment-15938277 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-10349: --- Thanks [~joel.bernstein], the distributed test suggestion helped me

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-10349: -- Attachment: SOLR-10349.patch Added CHANGES entry. > Add totalTermFreq support to TermsCompon

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-10349: -- Attachment: SOLR-10349.patch Patch implements the proposed addition. [~joel.bernstein], not sure

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10349) Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent

Shai Erera created SOLR-10349: - Summary: Add totalTermFreq support to TermsComponent Key: SOLR-10349 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10349 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

Re: Getting totalTermFreq and docFreq for terms

only receive stats for the first field (the rest are ignored), but if you don't specify terms.list, you get results for all fields. I don't see any reason not to support multiple fields with terms list, what do you think? On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:08 PM Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: &

Re: Getting totalTermFreq and docFreq for terms

the covers. > > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No, they are not global distributed stats. I am willing to live with > approximated stats though (unless again, there's

Re: Getting totalTermFreq and docFreq for terms

> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > I am currently using function queries to obtain these two statistics, as I > didn't see a better or more explicit API and the Terms component only > returns docFreq, but not totalTermF

Getting totalTermFreq and docFreq for terms

Hi I am currently using function queries to obtain these two statistics, as I didn't see a better or more explicit API and the Terms component only returns docFreq, but not totalTermFreq. The way I use the API is submit requests as follows: curl "

Re: Welcome Cao Manh Dat as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, 21:37 Michael McCandless wrote: > Welcome! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Joel Bernstein > wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Cao Manh Dat has

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15766325#comment-15766325 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7590: [~shia] where do you see that? I checked master and there's

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-7590. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.4 master (7.0) Committed to master

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590-sorted-set.patch Patch adds {{SortedDocValuesStats

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590-sorted-numeric.patch Patch adds DVStats for {{SortedNumericDocValuesField

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590-2.patch Patch adds {{sum}}, {{stdev}} and {{variance}} stats

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15748192#comment-15748192 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7590: There are now few tasks left: * Add more statistics

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch Patch changes {{DocValuesIterator}} package-private again and adds

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch [~jpountz] I accept your proposal about missing, only in case a reader

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15745855#comment-15745855 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7590: bq. Instead of using a NOOP_COLLECTOR, you could throw

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch Added tests for {{DoubleNumericDocValuesStats}}. Now that I review

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch Patch implements a {{DocValuesStatsCollector}}. Note some key design

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15743089#comment-15743089 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7590: bq. Let's implement the computation of these stats by writing

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch > Add DocValues statistics help

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch Thanks [~mikemccand] and [~thetaphi], I changed to a static class

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7590: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7590.patch First patch adds numeric statistics. I'd appreciate comments about

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7590) Add DocValues statistics helpers

Shai Erera created LUCENE-7590: -- Summary: Add DocValues statistics helpers Key: LUCENE-7590 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7590 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature

Re: Welcome Ishan Chattopadhyaya as Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations! On Wed, Nov 30, 2016, 01:02 Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Congratulations and welcome Ishan. > > I am happy to stop being the "new boy" of this distinguished club :-) > > Regards, >Alex. > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15414871#comment-15414871 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7344: bq. I don't understand most of what you're saying To clarify

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5944) Support updates of numeric DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413974#comment-15413974 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-5944: -- [~ichattopadhyaya], I've continued the discussion in LUCENE-7344. I am

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413364#comment-15413364 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7344: After chatting with Mike about this, here's an example

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-7344: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7344.patch Patch applies the DBQ after resolving the DV updates. With this patch

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413216#comment-15413216 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7344: Hmm ... I had to refresh my memory of the DV updates code and I

Re: Welcome Alexandre Rafalovitch as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Alexandre and congratulations! On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Welcome Alexandre! > > Dawid > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Alan Woodward wrote: > > Welcome Alexandre! > > > > Alan Woodward > > www.flax.co.uk > > > > > >

Re: Release Solr 5.5.3

Right, it affects SSL-enabled Solr more quickly. I do not know if it eventually affects non-SSL Solr, I guess not ... Also, it's not about high indexing rates, as it's reproduced with 9 docs/sec, IIRC. Anyway, it certainly affected several users already, so I'm +1 for the release. Shai On Wed,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9319) DELETEREPLICA should accept just count and remove replicas intelligenty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15384351#comment-15384351 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9319: -- Thanks [~noble.paul]. The issue description is a bit misleading

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9319) DELETEREPLICA should accept just count and remove replicas intelligenty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15384301#comment-15384301 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9319: -- What does "just count" mean? Will I not be able to delete

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376474#comment-15376474 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- bq. Which begs the question: why are there 15 CLOSE_WAIT connections

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375601#comment-15375601 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Oh I see. So we didn't experience the problem because we run w/ 2

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375582#comment-15375582 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Regarding the patch, the monitor looks good. Few comments: * I prefer

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375571#comment-15375571 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- bq. Do you have only two replicas? Perhaps the maxConnectionsPerHost

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375552#comment-15375552 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- bq. I thought that hypothesis holds only after SOLR-8533. Are you

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375548#comment-15375548 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Thanks [~shalinmangar]. Few questions: bq. Also, I think the reason

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375500#comment-15375500 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Thanks [~yo...@apache.org], I'll read the issue. I agree with what

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375184#comment-15375184 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Also [~markrmil...@gmail.com], for education purposes, if you have

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375151#comment-15375151 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- Thanks [~markrmil...@gmail.com]. In that case, what's your take

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375082#comment-15375082 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- An update -- I've modified our solr.xml (which is basically

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15374779#comment-15374779 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9290: -- bq. Interestingly, the number of connections stuck in CLOSE_WAIT

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7253) Sparse data in doc values and segments merging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268847#comment-15268847 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7253: I thought so, but that still needs to be benchmarked. Maybe

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7253) Sparse data in doc values and segments merging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268770#comment-15268770 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7253: bq. Read some actual literature on column store databases, see

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9057) CloudSolrClient should be able to work w/o ZK url

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268367#comment-15268367 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9057: -- In CSC code I see that {{connect()}} is called from several places

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9057) CloudSolrClient should be able to work w/o ZK url

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268329#comment-15268329 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9057: -- I thought that the whole idea of CSC is to use ZkStateReader so

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9057) CloudSolrClient should be able to work w/o ZK url

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268315#comment-15268315 ] Shai Erera edited comment on SOLR-9057 at 5/3/16 7:49 AM: -- How will it initiate

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9057) CloudSolrClient should be able to work w/o ZK url

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15268315#comment-15268315 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9057: -- How will it initiate {{ZkStateReader}} without getting the ZK host

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7253) Sparse data in doc values and segments merging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266764#comment-15266764 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-7253: To add to the sparsity discussion, when I did the numeric DV

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

When I ran the smoke tester for the first time, I encountered this test failure: [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin [junit4] 2> Creating dataDir:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9016) SolrIdentifierValidator accepts empty names

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15259689#comment-15259689 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9016: -- Thanks [~anshumg] for doing all the backports

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9016) SolrIdentifierValidator accepts empty names

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15258170#comment-15258170 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-9016: -- All tests pass, so if there are no objections, I'd like to push

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9016) SolrIdentifierValidator accepts empty names

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-9016: - Attachment: SOLR-9016.patch Patch fixes the regex to not accept empty identifiers, however it does

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9016) SolrIdentifierValidator accepts empty names

Shai Erera created SOLR-9016: Summary: SolrIdentifierValidator accepts empty names Key: SOLR-9016 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9016 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

+1, this (SOLR-8642) has bitten us already and had to revert back to 5.4.x. Shai On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:00 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to release 5.5.1, specially for to SOLR-8725. > > SOLR-8642 in 5.5 stops people from upgrading to 5.5 and a lot of

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8793) Fix stale commit files' size computation in LukeRequestHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved SOLR-8793. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Shai Erera Fix Version/s: 5.5.1 master

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8728) Splitting a shard of a collection created with a rule fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15185223#comment-15185223 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-8728: -- We usually set the fix version to be e.g. "5.5" and &qu

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8793) Fix stale commit files' size computation in LukeRequestHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated SOLR-8793: - Attachment: SOLR-8793.patch Patch fixes the bug by catching the {{IOException}} and returning -1

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8728) Splitting a shard of a collection created with a rule fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15185200#comment-15185200 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-8728: -- This is marked as fixed in 6.0, but should it also be marked for 6.1

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8587) Add segments file information to core admin status

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15182640#comment-15182640 ] Shai Erera commented on SOLR-8587: -- OK yea you're right, I was confused. The file can be read by the open

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >