Maybe there is another place to make that information available? The
release page?
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 6:34 PM David Smiley wrote:
> The goals / purpose of "Reproducible Builds" makes sense to me.
>
> However I wish the output that is the subject of reproducibility could be
> the JAR
The goals / purpose of "Reproducible Builds" makes sense to me.
However I wish the output that is the subject of reproducibility could be
the JAR *exclusive* of its MANIFEST.MF. There is some interesting metadata
in there -- not essential but a shame to throw away in the name of
reproducibility.
Some discussion on https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12096 lead to the
question of whether or not reproducible builds (
https://reproducible-builds.org/) are something we would like to work
towards. I'm a fan, though unlikely to have time to work on it soon.
What I can do is monitor this
