It's NOT been >72h since the vote was initiated, but consensus among at least 5
PMC members to release early as an exception due to the log4j fix.
The result is:
+1 13 (12 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
Counted votes are: janhoy, rmuir, thelabdude, mdrob, ishan, mikemccand,
+1
SUCCESS! [1:07:35.83944]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:28 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Thanks all, I'll close the vote now and start publishing the release...
>
> If you're a PMC member who planned to vote, but have not yet done so, there
> is still value in expressing your vote in this thread,
Thanks all, I'll close the vote now and start publishing the release...
If you're a PMC member who planned to vote, but have not yet done so, there is
still value in expressing your vote in this thread, further validating the
release. I'll tally the final count tomorrow as well, for the record.
Fast track please
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:34 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> fast track please :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:23 PM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> Fast-track please :)
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also
fast track please :)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:23 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Fast-track please :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
>> Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish
>> tomorrow, and not wait for Friday.
>> The release voting rules are
Fast-track please :)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish
> tomorrow, and not wait for Friday.
> The release voting rules are three or more +1 votes and more +1 votes than
> -1 votes, so for the vote to fail
Given the votes so far (11 binding +1) I'm also positive to publish tomorrow,
and not wait for Friday.
The release voting rules are three or more +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1
votes, so for the vote to fail we'd need more than 11 -1's from now :)
If I see at least 3 more of you in favor
I think we should publish, release and announce asap, not waiting for 72h
or the MVN propogation.
On Thu, 16 Dec, 2021, 2:40 am Anshum Gupta, wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Smoke tester is happy.
>
> SUCCESS! [1:03:13.162577]
>
> Also tested out a sample search/indexing app.
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021
+1 (binding)
Smoke tester is happy.
SUCCESS! [1:03:13.162577]
Also tested out a sample search/indexing app.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:36 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
ek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Uwe Schindler
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:27 PM
> > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE:
remen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:27 PM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1
> >
> > Will d
--
> > From: Timothy Potter
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:19 PM
> > To: lucene dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1
> >
> > Anyone try manually launching the RC on Windows? There's a change to
> > bin/solr.cmd in this release. I
Will do!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Potter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:19 PM
> To: lucene dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1
Anyone try manually launching the RC on Windows? There's a change to
bin/solr.cmd in this release. I tested before I committed but always
good to re-test with the RC just in case.
Tim
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:56:37.756257]
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 14,
SUCCESS! [0:56:37.756257]
+1
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:36 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
try was forgotten, but that's
> > not urgent.
> >
> > So here's my +1
> > Uwe
> >
> > -
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >> -Original Messag
; > -
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Jan Høydahl
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:36 PM
> >> To
ndler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Høydahl
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:36 PM
>> To: Lucene Dev
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr
nal Message-
> From: Jan Høydahl
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:36 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 RC1
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.or
If anyone wants to test RC1 in Docker or solr-operator, here is an image:
cominvent/solr:8.11.1-rc1
Example:
docker run --rm -p 8983:8983 cominvent/solr:8.11.1-rc1 -c
Jan
> 15. des. 2021 kl. 13:17 skrev Michael McCandless :
>
> +1 from me from smoke test result:
>
> SUCCESS!
+1 from me from smoke test result:
SUCCESS! [0:43:56.320467]
It failed the first time with this failure, but I re-ran and succeeded
above:
[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.JWTIssuerConfigTest
[junit4] 2> 996270 INFO
(SUITE-JWTIssuerConfigTest-seed#[6DC363670E25C70C]-worker)
[
Ran the smoke tested, and it passed.
SUCCESS! [1:21:47.769507]
+1
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 9:28 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> ran smoke tester - unit tests passed the first time but timed out
> downloading artifacts from maven. reran a second time, modifying the smoke
> test script to
+1 (binding)
ran smoke tester - unit tests passed the first time but timed out
downloading artifacts from maven. reran a second time, modifying the smoke
test script to not run solr tests (again) and the script passed.
started up a solr server from the unpacked download and verified it against
a
+1 (binding) ~ just ran smoke tester this time
SUCCESS! [1:16:20.247006]
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 7:36 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
Let's mention this change in release note only.
Uwe
Am 14. Dezember 2021 22:35:27 UTC schrieb "Jan Høydahl" :
>The only question I have is regarding Lucene, which lists (no changes).
>There IS one change though - it ships with log4j 2.16, but I guess that's only
>relevant for Luke since
+1
Jan, thank you for being the release manager!
Everyone, I know ppl are busy, maybe haven't slept or ate, but
please/begging let's just test out this RC, report back with VOTEs,
and get these fixes to the users as quick as possible. Let's take care
of addressing issues like this for the
The only question I have is regarding Lucene, which lists (no changes).
There IS one change though - it ships with log4j 2.16, but I guess that's only
relevant for Luke since everyone else consume Lucene through maven. Is it worth
a mention in the Lucene release-notes
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.11.1-RC1-rev0b002b11819df70783e83ef36b42ed1223c14b50
You can run the smoke tester directly (from a fresh branch_8_11 checkout), with
this
28 matches
Mail list logo
