[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824621#comment-15824621 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9941: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824614#comment-15824614 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9941: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824615#comment-15824615 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9941: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15818754#comment-15818754 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9941: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15815615#comment-15815615 ] Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-9941: --- Tentatively linking SOLR-8760 and SOLR-9941 as

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15814488#comment-15814488 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-9941: +1 for remove {{boolean onStartup}}. The rest a good to me. >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15813726#comment-15813726 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-9941: Here are the reason to explain why Hoss's test fails : - When the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15813309#comment-15813309 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-9941: {quote} Seems to me that updates arriving during

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15813256#comment-15813256 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-9941: {quote} I wanted to beef up Ishan's

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15813195#comment-15813195 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-9941: {quote} One question i have is: if the only code

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15812443#comment-15812443 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-9941: The patch looks pretty good to me -- but i'm not a tlog expert. One

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15812165#comment-15812165 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-9941: Fyi, [~shalinmangar], [~caomanhdat] please review.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806431#comment-15806431 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-9941: I'm guessing this situation exists because the {{RecentUpdates}} code was