Oops looks like I replied to you direct rather than the list...
The thing that I am drawn too is the RC in the naming. Maybe it's just me
but something which that in the filename suggests that the contents are an
RC not the final release. I think that someone coming fresh to the project
would just
You're absolutely right, and this was entirely my fault. I've updated the tags
to have RC2_final, updated the blog (and responded to some comments there), and
republished the homepage to reflect the changed blog post.
Is there anything I missed?
I'll make sure we're more buttoned up with futur
+1
31.10.2012 13:26, Andy Pook пишет:
Just nit picking at the details...
The announcement at
https://blogs.apache.org/lucenenet/entry/lucene_net_3_0_3 points to an svn
tag for RC1. The binaries have RC2 in the name. It's not clear what
revision the nuget packages are built from.
It's not clear
Just nit picking at the details...
The announcement at
https://blogs.apache.org/lucenenet/entry/lucene_net_3_0_3 points to an svn
tag for RC1. The binaries have RC2 in the name. It's not clear what
revision the nuget packages are built from.
It's not clear if the vote was for RC2 to be accepted a
