On 22/10/2015 23:21, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
You're absolutely right, avoiding an index which counts code points is
consistent with our iterator-centric model for string processing. Good
insight, and nice API proposal!
I'm also tempted to remove Str_Code_Point_At and make string iterators the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
> On 18/10/2015 14:01, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
- Make `Find` return a size_t.
Requires special value for "not found".
>>>
>>> Hmm, that's a toughie. If the sentinel is SIZE_MAX, that might not fit in
>>> all host numeric types.
>
On 18/10/2015 14:01, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
- Make `Find` return a size_t.
Requires special value for "not found".
Hmm, that's a toughie. If the sentinel is SIZE_MAX, that might not fit in all
host numeric types.
Good point. The problem is not so much the byte size of the return type but