Github user snaga commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/57
Hi, I updated the PR and confirmed that "install-check" can pass on 9.4,
9.5 and 9.6beta2.
Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
On 7/20/16 4:17 PM, Joe Hellerstein wrote:
I heartily concur with this assessment FWIW. I generally use views or WITH
clauses myself when building up these kinds of pipelines.
Note that WITH forces materialization. It's almost as bad as temp tables.
In my experience, the PostgreSQL optimize
Github user fmcquillan99 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/57
Here are the supported platforms for MADlib 1.9:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/FAQ#FAQ-Q1-2WhatplatformsdoesMADlibsupport?
Will update this for 1.9.1 to
Thanks for the additional comment, Joe.
Frank
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Joe Hellerstein
wrote:
> I heartily concur with this assessment FWIW. I generally use views or
> WITH clauses myself when building up these kinds of pipelines.
>
> In my experience, the PostgreSQL optimizer is not g
I heartily concur with this assessment FWIW. I generally use views or WITH
clauses myself when building up these kinds of pipelines.
In my experience, the PostgreSQL optimizer is not great at collapsing views
though. So caveat emptor. Users should be made very aware of EXPLAIN!
J
On July
Github user danielgustafsson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/57
The current version of GPDB (4.3.8.x) does not have `array_agg(anyarray)`
and it's not included in the upcoming 5.0 codebase either.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Thanks for suggesting this topic, Greg. Looking forward to it.
Frank
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Gregory Chase wrote:
> Dear MADlib community,
> We're holding another Apache MADlib (incubating) community call next week,
> Wednesday, July 27, at 9AM.
>
> Topic: Ask Us Anything (about MAD
Dear MADlib community,
We're holding another Apache MADlib (incubating) community call next week,
Wednesday, July 27, at 9AM.
Topic: Ask Us Anything (about MADlib)
Agenda: Whatever we get asked
Join us for an open Q&A about using MADlib. We'll have the best expert
contributors and data science
Hey Jim,
Thank you for the thoughtful response.
Given your comments, I think we ought to stick with a view as the default
for sessionize. Looking ahead to MADlib 2.0, one thing we want to better
support is workflows since chaining operations together is such a common
data science thing to do. T
On 7/19/16 7:36 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
"create_view (optional)
BOOLEAN default: TRUE. Determines whether to create a view or materialize a
table as output. If you only needed session info once, creating a view
could be significantly faster than materializing as a table."
Question is: should
Github user snaga commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/57#discussion_r71476210
--- Diff: methods/array_ops/src/pg_gp/array_ops.sql_in ---
@@ -602,11 +602,22 @@ m4_ifdef(`__HAS_FUNCTION_PROPERTIES__', `NO SQL', `');
*i
11 matches
Mail list logo
