Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > Hi Satoshi, > > Thanks for trying the RC and discovering the issue. The '._' files were > sneaked in by osx during the packaging - I'll create a new RC and upload > that in a few minutes. > > @apache-veterans: Should this be uploaded as a new RC

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

2016-09-02 Thread Nandish Jayaram
+1 On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > Hello MADlib community, > > We have created a MADlib 1.9.1 RC-2, with the artifacts below up for a > vote. > > This release candidate replaces RC-1. The only difference between RC-1 and > RC-2 is > that some ._’ files were sneaked in

[GitHub] incubator-madlib-site issue #4: Website 1dot9dot1

2016-09-02 Thread fmcquillan99
Github user fmcquillan99 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib-site/pull/4 Xiaochang cherry picked the commit I needed and merged it. So closing this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitH

[GitHub] incubator-madlib-site pull request #4: Website 1dot9dot1

2016-09-02 Thread fmcquillan99
Github user fmcquillan99 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib-site/pull/4 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] incubator-madlib-site issue #4: Website 1dot9dot1

2016-09-02 Thread mktal
Github user mktal commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib-site/pull/4 @fmcquillan99 It has been merged. Could you close this please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje

[GitHub] incubator-madlib-site pull request #4: Website 1dot9dot1

2016-09-02 Thread fmcquillan99
GitHub user fmcquillan99 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib-site/pull/4 Website 1dot9dot1 Update new videos and pre-announce 1.9.1 release. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/fmcquillan9

[VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

2016-09-02 Thread Frank McQuillan
Hello MADlib community, We have created a MADlib 1.9.1 RC-2, with the artifacts below up for a vote. This release candidate replaces RC-1. The only difference between RC-1 and RC-2 is that some ._’ files were sneaked in by OSX during the packaging. These have been removed. This will be the 3rd

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Rahul Iyer
Note to all using OSX for future archives: use COPYFILE_DISABLE=1 during the tar to avoid copying the '._' files » COPYFILE_DISABLE=1 tar czf apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > Thanks. I wi

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Frank McQuillan
Thanks. I will re-send the [VOTE] request. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > New RC uploaded with source files at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9. > 1-incubating-rc2/ > > Everything else remains the same. > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Frank

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Rahul Iyer
New RC uploaded with source files at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9. 1-incubating-rc2/ Everything else remains the same. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > I think that is the safest approach, to create a new RC. > > Let us cancel the vote on R

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Frank McQuillan
I think that is the safest approach, to create a new RC. Let us cancel the vote on RC-1 and when RC-2 is posted, I will call for a new vote Thank you Satoshi for catching this. Frank On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Orhan Kislal wrote: > I am not an apache veteran but I think it should be a ne

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Orhan Kislal
I am not an apache veteran but I think it should be a new RC. Here is a passage from the apache release best practices website. Modifications Once an artifact has been uploaded, it must never be modified. Not only is there no guarantee that the modified artifact will be correctly archived or mirro

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Rahul Iyer
Hi Satoshi, Thanks for trying the RC and discovering the issue. The '._' files were sneaked in by osx during the packaging - I'll create a new RC and upload that in a few minutes. @apache-veterans: Should this be uploaded as a new RC or just update the existing RC and signature files? - Rahul O

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
Hi Frank, Running "find . | fgrep /._ | xargs rm" before building fixes the build error, so I think those binary files must be removed before the official release. Regards, 2016-09-02 22:14 GMT+09:00 Satoshi Nagayasu : > Frank, > > I have tried to build RC1 from the tarball, and I have a questi

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
Frank, I have tried to build RC1 from the tarball, and I have a question. I got a build error when building on CentOS 6.6 as below. [snaga@localhost build]$ env LANG=C make [ 0%] Built target EP_boost [ 1%] Built target EP_eigen [ 1%] Built target EP_pyxb [ 1%] Built target pythonFiles [ 1%