Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc2

I have taken a quick look at the DMG and a Linux RPM binary artifacts (sorry haven't had time to build and/or test the binaries yet). But this info might be of some benefit to the team sooner than later. Regards, -=e -- *Ed Espino*

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc2

Thanks for updating to RC-2, Rashmi. I just tried the dmg on OSX on PG9.6 on my local machine and the soft link seems to be set correctly now, since it upgraded 1.11 over 1.10 OK. When I uninstalled MADlib and did a fresh install, that worked fine too for 1.11. So... +1 Frank On Tue, May 2,

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc1

Thanks Ed for pointing out your observations on RC-1. Let us then cancel the RC-1 release and try again with RC-2. We will send out another email with a request for voting on RC-2. Thanks again, Rashmi On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Ed Espino wrote: > Frank, > > Thanks

[GitHub] incubator-madlib pull request #129: DT/RF: Allow expressions in feature list

GitHub user iyerr3 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/129 DT/RF: Allow expressions in feature list JIRA: MADLIB-1087 Changes: - Add numeric as a continuous type - Get data type of features from an expression instead of the table

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc1

Frank, Thanks for the clarification. Here comes my $.02 worth ... In this case, might it make sense to send an addendum to the voting request email with wording indicating the convenience binaries are also to be voted on? This will give community members an indication that they should attempt to

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc1

Hi Ed, The binaries are up for a vote for 1.11. Although we have hosted convenience binaries on the Apache dist site in the past, we have not explicitly included them in the RC's that we have posted for community vote on a release. Guidance from one of our mentors suggested that we start to do

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc1

Requesting a point of vote clarification: Caveat: I am relatively new to the Apache HAWQ incubating project and my level of experience with general Apache processes (incubating or otherwise) is limited. Thus, my point of clarification and follow up question may be misguided. I apologize if this

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc1

+1 On Mon, 1 May 2017 18:18:32 -0700 Joe Hellerstein wrote: > +1 > > Sent from a telephone. > > > On May 1, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Ivan Novick wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:56 PM, ChenLiang Wang > >>