+1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Greg Chase wrote:
> Sorry to be slow to respond to this.
>
> Big +1
>
> Great idea working through the IP clearance as a first release, and then
> moving on to new functionality!
>
> -Greg
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Frank McQuillan
> wrote:
>
> > He
>
>
> > There's no process requirement like that. Being a committer on the
> project
> > helps with certain things, but in fact volunteering as an RM is a great
> way
> > for new folks to start generating karma towards being considered a
> > committer
> > on the project.
>
> FM >>> Thanks Orhan for
t of code
generation.
Regards,
Caleb
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Caleb Welton wrote:
> Great seeing the prototype work here, I'm sure that there is something
> that we can find from this work that we can bring into MADlib.
>
> However... It is a very different implemen
I definitely like the idea of having our first Apache Release.
The questions in my mind are largely related to what is the scope of the
release, and why is it an alpha release?
We had a stable MADlib 1.8 release prior to incubation into Apache.
- If the goal is getting our first Apache release a
Great seeing the prototype work here, I'm sure that there is something that
we can find from this work that we can bring into MADlib.
However... It is a very different implementation from the existing
algorithms, calling into the madlib matrix functions directly rather than
having the majority of
Welcome Xiaocheng! Based on the contributions you've already made it's
clear you'll be a great addition to the community. Keep it up!
It's great seeing the community growing.
-Caleb
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> Congrats Xiaocheng! Welcome to the club!
>
> Thank
PGXN recently came up in a discussion I was having with respect to MADlib
and I wanted to post some information here to the dev list for the
community to consider.
PGXN, the PostGres eXtension Network, is a portal/tool that provides easy
access to common Postgres extensions, similar to CPAN for pe
Hi ChenLiang,
Thanks for taking the next step to flush this out.
As a whole:
- naming and basic interface seems consistent with existing conventions.
- names are descriptive.
- references to the literature is provided.
- functionality is complementary to the library.
What is not clear to me is:
This is one place, however I'd have to look at the LO API to understand if it
gets past the memory allocation limitation, and then we'd have to discuss
design of implementation and whether it would be implemented both in GPDB and
HAWQ - which would be a requirement for MADlib.
Sent from my iPho
Thanks Ted.
Echoing some of the followup discussion we had over on the HAWQ mailing
list Roman suggested doing something similar to what Groovy did, i.e.
incorporate a maturity model document into our code and review it around
how we can continue to make improvements and move the project towards
g
Indrajith,
Thank you for your interest in joining the MADlib project.
Based on your followup questions I'm guessing the question is more about
"how do I understand the code of the project" and less "what are the
mechanics of contributing" to an Apache project.
You might want to start by reading
The MADlib report has been posted.
Cheers,
Caleb
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Guys,
>
> your first report is due in a couple of days. Here's where it needs to be
> submitted https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2015
>
> Please let me know if you need any he
12 matches
Mail list logo
