Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > Hi Satoshi, > > Thanks for trying the RC and discovering the issue. The '._' files were > sneaked in by osx during the packaging - I'll create a new RC and upload > that in a few minutes. > > @apache-veterans: Should this be

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Rahul Iyer
Note to all using OSX for future archives: use COPYFILE_DISABLE=1 during the tar to avoid copying the '._' files ยป COPYFILE_DISABLE=1 tar czf apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Frank McQuillan

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Frank McQuillan
I think that is the safest approach, to create a new RC. Let us cancel the vote on RC-1 and when RC-2 is posted, I will call for a new vote Thank you Satoshi for catching this. Frank On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Orhan Kislal wrote: > I am not an apache veteran but I

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-02 Thread Rahul Iyer
Hi Satoshi, Thanks for trying the RC and discovering the issue. The '._' files were sneaked in by osx during the packaging - I'll create a new RC and upload that in a few minutes. @apache-veterans: Should this be uploaded as a new RC or just update the existing RC and signature files? - Rahul

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc1

2016-09-01 Thread Rahul Iyer
+1 On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > Hello MADlib community, > > We have created a MADlib 1.9.1 release candidate, with the artifacts below > up for a vote. > > This will be the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating). > > The main goals of this