Re: Options in TrainClassifier.java

2010-09-17 Thread Joe Kumar
Gangadhar, I couldnt find any concrete reason behind this error. Some of them have reported this to happen very sporadic. As per some suggestions in this thread ( http://www.mail-archive.com/core-u...@hadoop.apache.org/msg09250.html) , I have changed the location of hadoop tmp dir. Also I have cle

Re: Options in TrainClassifier.java

2010-09-17 Thread Gangadhar Nittala
Thank you Joe for the confirmation. I am also checking the code to see what is causing this issue. May be others in the list will know what can cause this issue. I am guessing the root cause is not Mahout but something in Hadoop. On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Joe Kumar wrote: > Gangadhar, > >

Re: Meetup in the Bay Area in Sept?

2010-09-17 Thread Ted Dunning
Looks pretty much right to me. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote: > Hi Robin, > > I had a little epiphany after last night and blogged about it on > http://jeffeastman.blogspot.com/. Like everything I've ever blogged it > feels a little underwhelming and kind of lame but maybe

Re: Meetup in the Bay Area in Sept?

2010-09-17 Thread Jeff Eastman
Hi Robin, I had a little epiphany after last night and blogged about it on http://jeffeastman.blogspot.com/. Like everything I've ever blogged it feels a little underwhelming and kind of lame but maybe that's just me. Put it on the home page at your own discretion. Jeff On 9/17/10 12:59 AM

Hudson build is back to normal : Mahout-Quality #288

2010-09-17 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910823#action_12910823 ] Hudson commented on MAHOUT-503: --- Integrated in Mahout-Quality #288 (See [https://hudson.apac

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Mahout-Quality #287

2010-09-17 Thread Ted Dunning
These are my mistakes. I should have a fix in shortly. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Apache Hudson Server < hud...@hudson.apache.org> wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [tdunning] Made test learn less to start. > > [tdunning] Added

Build failed in Hudson: Mahout-Quality #287

2010-09-17 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [tdunning] Made test learn less to start. [tdunning] Added flush to test, made ALR test learn shorter time so additional improvement is discernible [tdunning] Split test into two parts for more resolution [tdunning]

Build failed in Hudson: Mahout-Quality #286

2010-09-17 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [tdunning] MAHOUT-503 - added tests for 32 bit murmur hash. [tdunning] Simplification of Auc code structure. [tdunning] Cosmetic removal of a blank line [tdunning] Separated classifier from link function. [tdunning

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Ted Dunning (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Dunning resolved MAHOUT-503. Resolution: Not A Problem New tests checked in. > Bad murmur hash implementation ?!? > ---

[jira] Reopened: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Ted Dunning (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Dunning reopened MAHOUT-503: Assignee: Ted Dunning I just copied over the tests from the blog (all marked as public domain).

Re: [jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Ted Dunning
Thanks for the warning anyway! Btw... since MurmurHash is beginning to look like a critical path on some modeling, I think I am going to go back and port the 32 bit version. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Thomas Sauzedde (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-5

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-396) Proposal for Implementing Hidden Markov Model

2010-09-17 Thread Isabel Drost (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isabel Drost updated MAHOUT-396: Attachment: MAHOUT-396.diff Patch should be applied with -p1 set. One more sweep over the patch to

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Sauzedde (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910490#action_12910490 ] Thomas Sauzedde edited comment on MAHOUT-503 at 9/17/10 3:20 AM:

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Sauzedde (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Sauzedde resolved MAHOUT-503. Resolution: Invalid Didn't notice the comment neither the diff between the code base and th