[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998650#comment-12998650
]
Timothy Potter commented on MAHOUT-588:
---
Good point about the naming conventions ...
> So Dawid, if there were a LinearDenseMatrix that used a strided dense
> representation, what that meet your native code needs? Given our
> AbstractMatrix data structure and reasonably abstract tests, it would be
> pretty easy to build this.
Yes, this would be helpful. I believe it makes a lot
So Dawid, if there were a LinearDenseMatrix that used a strided dense
representation, what that meet your native code needs? Given our
AbstractMatrix data structure and reasonably abstract tests, it would be
pretty easy to build this.
I think that would make adding JNI or JNA code for some ops pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998284#comment-12998284
]
Isabel Drost commented on MAHOUT-612:
-
Robin I agree with your concern of avoiding an
>> org.apache.mahout.math.matrix.DoubleMatrix1D.toArray())
>>
>> org.apache.mahout.math.matrix.DoubleMatrix2D.toStringShort())
> The first one can be supported very easily. At least, in looking through
> your list it seems like we already do, or could trivially support everything
> in your list.
