[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117908#comment-13117908
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-822:
The changes to the pom look pretty benign. I wou
If supporting 0.23 means dropping 0.20, then I think it will be a while
before that is a good thing. Lots of our users need 0.20 and it will be a
long time before most large installs switch to 0.23.
We may wind up with many 0.6 point releases.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Sean Owen (Comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117856#comment-13117856
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-822:
--
Yes I think there's going to be a medium-sized patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Shaposhnik updated MAHOUT-822:
Summary: Mahout needs to be made compatible with Hadoop .23 releases (was:
Mahout needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117778#comment-13117778
]
Roman Shaposhnik commented on MAHOUT-822:
-
The good news is that the delta between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117722#comment-13117722
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-822:
I think that the Mahout community is pretty clear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Shaposhnik updated MAHOUT-822:
Summary: Mahout needs to be made compatible with Hadoop .22 and Hadoop .23
releases (was:
Mahout needs to be made compatible with Hadoop .22 and Hadoop .22 releases
--
Key: MAHOUT-822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822
Project: Mahout
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Shaposhnik updated MAHOUT-822:
Affects Version/s: 0.6
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Mahout nee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Shaposhnik updated MAHOUT-822:
Attachment: MAHOUT-822-build.patch.txt
> Mahout needs to be made compatible with Hadoop
The input mapper doesn't like the format of your data
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:14 AM, "ww107826" <165385...@qq.com> wrote:
> hello
>I have a same question.
> 11/09/29 10:29:51 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 6% reduce 0%
> 11/09/29 10:29:54 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 44% reduce
I have the same quetion,can you tell me how to sovle it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/jira-Created-MAHOUT-504-Kmeans-clustering-error-tp1531052p3379359.html
Sent from the Mahout Developer List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hello
I have a same question.
11/09/29 10:29:51 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 6% reduce 0%
11/09/29 10:29:54 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 44% reduce 0%
11/09/29 10:29:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id :
attempt_201109291022_0001_m_01_0, Status : FAILED
java.lang.NumberFormatException: multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen reassigned MAHOUT-609:
Assignee: Sean Owen (was: Sebastian Schelter)
> Add an option to make RecommenderJob write out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117243#comment-13117243
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-695:
--
Hey Mat, looks like a good patch, and Jake likes it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117241#comment-13117241
]
Sebastian Schelter commented on MAHOUT-609:
---
Take it if you want to :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13117238#comment-13117238
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-609:
--
Sebastian you want me to have a look? I'm combing thr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-778:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-778.patch
OK here's an omnibus patch, including Jeff's idea. It shows the extent of th
I am talking about results from one run, from this loop. I saw 6 different
results.
I can't think of any likely reason that would cause it to return the same
results. The only thing I can imagine is that something is resetting the RNG
each time, since our tests are able to do that, but I don't see
Yes, separate runs from the command line or Eclipse vary by +/- a bit. It is
only when I run this loop inside one program run that I see the behavior.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I don't see this behavior. Each result is slightly different by about +/-2%
> when I run it,
I don't see this behavior. Each result is slightly different by about +/-2%
when I run it, as expected.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> If you run this version of GroupLensRecommenderEvaluatorRunner, an odd
> thing
> happens. The first evaluation will be number X, the sec
21 matches
Mail list logo
